| Literature DB >> 20386650 |
Andrew R Raduski1, Loren H Rieseberg2, Jared L Strasburg1.
Abstract
Species delimitation has long been a difficult and controversial process, and different operational criteria often lead to different results. In particular, investigators using phenotypic vs. molecular data to delineate species may recognize different boundaries, especially if morphologically or ecologically differentiated populations have only recently diverged. Here we examine the genetic relationship between the widespread sunflower species Helianthus petiolaris and its narrowly distributed sand dune endemic sister species H. neglectus using sequence data from nine nuclear loci. The two species were initially described as distinct based on a number of minor morphological differences, somewhat different ecological tolerances, and at least one chromosomal rearrangement distinguishing them; but detailed molecular data has not been available until now. We find that, consistent with previous work, H. petiolaris is exceptionally genetically diverse. Surprisingly, H. neglectus harbors very similar levels of genetic diversity (average diversity across loci is actually slightly higher in H. neglectus). It is extremely unlikely that such a geographically restricted species could maintain these levels of genetic variation in isolation. In addition, the two species show very little evidence of any genetic divergence, and estimates of interspecific gene flow are comparable to gene flow estimates among regions within H. petiolaris. These results indicate that H. petiolaris and H. neglectus likely do not represent two distinct, isolated gene pools; H. neglectus is probably more accurately thought of as a geographically restricted, morphologically and ecologically distinct subspecies of H. petiolaris rather than a separate species.Entities:
Keywords: endemism; gene flow; genetic variation; reproductive barriers; species delimitation
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20386650 PMCID: PMC2852850 DOI: 10.3390/ijms11020492
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
General information and summary statistics for all nine loci. π and θ values are per base pair.
| (2213) | 6 | 688 | Scarecrow transcription factor family protein | 32 | 0.019 | 0.024 | 16 | 0.017 | 0.022 | 2.66 | 0.46 |
| JLS244 | 9 | 571 | Proton-dependent oligopeptide transport (POT) family protein | 30 | 0.024 | 0.036 | 16 | 0.030 | 0.037 | 1.76 | 0.12 |
| JLS720a | 16 | 687 | Cellulose synthase-related protein | 32 | 0.028 | 0.037 | 2 | 0.040 | 0.039 | 1.93 | 0.00 |
| JLS810R1 | 13 | 1326 | Auxin efflux carrier protein family | 32 | 0.053 | 0.039 | 16 | 0.063 | 0.058 | 4.43 | 0.37 |
| JLS1040 | 10 | 659 | Serine/threonine phosphatase | 96 | 0.046 | 0.063 | 16 | 0.045 | 0.062 | 2.43 | 0.07 |
| JLS1615 | 14 | 575 | Unknown protein | 96 | 0.044 | 0.082 | 16 | 0.051 | 0.060 | 1.14 | 0.06 |
| JLS1747R2 | 17 | 789 | Amino acid permease family protein | 90 | 0.062 | 0.093 | 16 | 0.061 | 0.076 | 2.47 | 0.04 |
| JLS1953 | 17 | 454 | Galacturonosyltransferase 4 | 32 | 0.016 | 0.024 | 16 | 0.008 | 0.011 | 1.19 | 0.05 |
| JLS2899 | 14 | 776 | Unknown protein | 32 | 0.032 | 0.057 | 16 | 0.052 | 0.067 | 1.48 | 0.04 |
| Average | 725 | 0.036 | 0.051 | 0.041 | 0.048 | 2.17 | 0.14 | ||||
Summary of four types of segregating sites found within or between species (see Wakeley and Hey [16]).
| (2213) | 33 | 30 | 15 | 0 |
| JLS244 | 24 | 22 | 13 | 0 |
| JLS720a | 40 | 8 | 10 | 0 |
| JLS810R1 | 27 | 44 | 39 | 0 |
| JLS1040 | 79 | 36 | 37 | 0 |
| JLS1615 | 47 | 8 | 19 | 0 |
| JLS1747R2 | 98 | 29 | 56 | 0 |
| JLS1953 | 32 | 5 | 9 | 0 |
| JLS2899 | 30 | 28 | 29 | 0 |
| Overall | 410 | 210 | 227 | 0 |
Results of Tajima’s (D) and Fu’s (Fs) tests of neutrality, with significance assessed based on 1000 simulations using Arlequin. Significant results are presented in bold; tests marked with asterisks are significant after Bonferroni correction. Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs were not calculated for locus JLS720a in H. neglectus, as only two haplotypes were sampled.
| (2213) | −0.491 | 0.353 | −14.547 | −0.738 | 0.234 | −2.918 | 0.052 | |
| JLS244 | −0.857 | 0.214 | −24.231 | −0.893 | 0.218 | −9.227 | ||
| JLS720a | −1.008 | 0.166 | −23.772 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| JLS810R1 | 1.423 | 0.952 | −6.959 | 0.344 | 0.702 | −5.905 | ||
| JLS1040 | −1.279 | 0.070 | −23.957 | −1.196 | 0.118 | −3.941 | ||
| JLS1615 | −1.721 | −25.183 | −0.932 | 0.196 | −11.118 | |||
| JLS1747R2 | −1.209 | 0.105 | −23.990 | −1.197 | 0.110 | −3.922 | ||
| JLS1953 | −1.326 | 0.074 | −24.396 | −0.878 | 0.205 | −6.512 | ||
| JLS2899 | −1.698 | −24.103 | −1.014 | 0.161 | −6.586 | |||
Effective population size estimates (modes and 95% confidence intervals) made using MIGRATE. Regions within H. petiolaris are shown in Figure 1. These biological quantities were calculated from MIGRATE parameter estimates as described in the methods.
| Eastern | 2.42 × 105 | 0 | 4.87 × 105 |
| Western | 2.92 × 105 | 4.74 × 104 | 5.33 × 105 |
| Sympatric | 6.42 × 105 | 1.51 × 105 | 1.97 × 106 |
| 2.29 × 106 | 8.45 × 105 | 9.20 × 106 |
Gene flow (Nem) estimates made using MIGRATE. Receiving region is listed across the top of the table, and source region is listed down the left side. Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. Regions within H. petiolaris are shown in Figure 1. EP = eastern H. petiolaris populations; WP = western H. petiolaris populations; SP = H. petiolaris populations sympatric with H. neglectus; NE = H. neglectus populations. These biological quantities were calculated from MIGRATE parameter estimates as described in the methods.
| from EP | - | 0.01 (0–3.80) | 0.01 (0–4.98) | 0.01 (0–5.08) |
| from WP | 0.01 (0–3.80) | - | 0.01 (0–5.50) | 0.01 (0–4.83) |
| from SP | 0.01 (0–3.88) | 0.01 (0–3.78) | - | 0.01 (0–5.13) |
| from NE | 0.01 (0–3.90) | 0.01 (0–3.78) | 0.01 (0–4.70) | - |
Sampling localities. Geographic sites are shown in Figure 1. Population superscripts refer to AMOVA and MIGRATE groupings (1 = eastern H. petiolaris populations, 2 = western H. petiolaris populations, 3 = H. petiolaris populations sympatric with H. neglectus, 4 = H. neglectus populations).
| KSG1 | Great Bend, KS | 38.36 | 98.76 | 5 | |
| NDM1 | Minot, ND | 48.30 | 100.71 | 5 | |
| NEO1 | O’Neill, NE | 42.29 | 98.63 | 5 | |
| OK11 | Cotton Co., OK | 34.33 | 98.40 | 5 | |
| Pet_12832 | Coconino Co., AZ | 36.04 | 111.19 | 3 | |
| Pet_12872 | Kane Co., UT | 37.24 | 112.86 | 2 | |
| Pet_16042 | Kane Co., UT | 37.03 | 112.48 | 2 | |
| Pet_12772 | Coconino Co., AZ | 36.78 | 111.55 | 2 | |
| Pet_12792 | Navajo Co., AZ | 35.75 | 109.91 | 2 | |
| Pet_12922 | Hanksville, UT | 38.35 | 110.69 | 2 | |
| Pet_12852 | Kane Co., UT | 37.52 | 111.98 | 1 | |
| Pet_13232 | San Juan Co., UT | 37.03 | 110.13 | 1 | |
| Pet_12712 | Iron Co., UT | 38.08 | 112.69 | 1 | |
| Pet_13252 | Iron Co., UT | 38.08 | 112.68 | 1 | |
| Pet_13273 | Puerto de Luna, NM | 34.82 | 104.63 | 3 | |
| Pet_13323 | Monahans, TX | 31.62 | 102.90 | 4 | |
| Pet_lin3 | Lincoln Co., NM | 33.95 | 105.41 | 2 | |
| Pet_trb3 | Tularosa Basin, NM | 32.90 | 105.96 | 2 | |
| NMRO4 | Roswell, NM | 33.40 | 104.53 | 2 | |
| NMLO4 | Loving, NM | 32.29 | 104.09 | 2 | |
| NMLH4 | Loco Hills, NM | 32.82 | 103.97 | 2 | |
| TXMO4 | Monahans, TX | 31.60 | 102.89 | 2 |
Figure 1.Sampling localities for H. petiolaris and H. neglectus individuals used in this study. Respective ranges are denoted with shading. Solid ovals encircle H petiolaris population groups used in AMOVA and MIGRATE analyses. Latitude, longitude and sample sizes are given in Table 6.