Literature DB >> 11298987

Using phylogeographic analyses of gene trees to test species status and processes.

A R Templeton1.   

Abstract

A gene tree is an evolutionary reconstruction of the genealogical history of the genetic variation found in a sample of homologous genes or DNA regions that have experienced little or no recombination. Gene trees have the potential of straddling the interface between intra- and interspecific evolution. It is precisely at this interface that the process of speciation occurs, and gene trees can therefore be used as a powerful tool to probe this interface. One application is to infer species status. The cohesion species is defined as an evolutionary lineage or set of lineages with genetic exchangeability and/or ecological interchangeability. This species concept can be phrased in terms of null hypotheses that can be tested rigorously and objectively by using gene trees. First, an overlay of geography upon the gene tree is used to test the null hypothesis that the sample is from a single evolutionary lineage. This phase of testing can indicate that the sampled organisms are indeed from a single lineage and therefore a single cohesion species. In other cases, this null hypothesis is not rejected due to a lack of power or inadequate sampling. Alternatively, this null hypothesis can be rejected because two or more lineages are in the sample. The test can identify lineages even when hybridization and lineage sorting occur. Only when this null hypothesis is rejected is there the potential for more than one cohesion species. Although all cohesion species are evolutionary lineages, not all evolutionary lineages are cohesion species. Therefore, if the first null hypothesis is rejected, a second null hypothesis is tested that all lineages are genetically exchangeable and/or ecologically interchangeable. This second test is accomplished by direct contrasts of previously identified lineages or by overlaying reproductive and/or ecological data upon the gene tree and testing for significant transitions that are concordant with the previously identified lineages. Only when this second null hypothesis is rejected is a lineage elevated to the status of cohesion species. By using gene trees in this manner, species can be identified with objective, a priori criteria with an inference procedure that automatically yields much insight into the process of speciation. When one or more of the null hypotheses cannot be rejected, this procedure also provides specific guidance for future work that will be needed to judge species status.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11298987     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01199.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  38 in total

1.  Population genetic structure of chub mackerel Scomber japonicus in the Northwestern Pacific inferred from microsatellite analysis.

Authors:  Jiao Cheng; Takashi Yanagimoto; Na Song; Tian-Xiang Gao
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers.

Authors:  Michael T Monaghan; Michael Balke; T Ryan Gregory; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Phylogeographic history and gene flow among giant Galápagos tortoises on southern Isabela Island.

Authors:  Claudio Ciofi; Gregory A Wilson; Luciano B Beheregaray; Cruz Marquez; James P Gibbs; Washington Tapia; Howard L Snell; Adalgisa Caccone; Jeffrey R Powell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Beyond barcodes: complex DNA taxonomy of a South Pacific Island radiation.

Authors:  Michael T Monaghan; Michael Balke; Joan Pons; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Things fall apart: biological species form unconnected parsimony networks.

Authors:  Michael W Hart; Jennifer Sunday
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Hybrid fitness, adaptation and evolutionary diversification: lessons learned from Louisiana Irises.

Authors:  M L Arnold; E S Ballerini; A N Brothers
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  The diverse applications of cladistic analysis of molecular evolution, with special reference to nested clade analysis.

Authors:  Alan R Templeton
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Distinguishing between hot-spots and melting-pots of genetic diversity using haplotype connectivity.

Authors:  Binh Nguyen; Andreas Spillner; Brent C Emerson; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 1.405

9.  Algorithmic approaches to aid species' delimitation in multidimensional morphospace.

Authors:  Thomas H G Ezard; Paul N Pearson; Andy Purvis
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Sharp phylogeographic breaks and patterns of genealogical concordance in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana.

Authors:  Stefania Maniatsi; Ilias Kappas; Athanasios D Baxevanis; Theodora Farmaki; Theodore J Abatzopoulos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.