BACKGROUND: In Huntington disease (HD), substantial striatal atrophy precedes clinical motor symptoms. Accordingly, neuroprotection should prevent major cell loss before such symptoms arise. To evaluate neuroprotection, biomarkers such as MRI measures are needed. This requires first establishing the best imaging approach. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, we acquired T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted scans in 39 preclinical (pre-HD) individuals and 25 age-matched controls. T1-weighted scans were analyzed with gross whole-brain segmentation and voxel-based morphometry. Analysis of diffusion-weighted scans used skeleton-based tractography. For all imaging measures, we compared pre-HD and control groups and within the pre-HD group we examined correlations with estimated years to clinical onset. RESULTS: Pre-HD individuals had lower gross gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volume. Voxel-wise analysis demonstrated local GM volume loss, most notably in regions consistent with basal ganglia-thalamocortical pathways. By contrast, pre-HD individuals showed widespread reductions in WM integrity, probably due to a loss of axonal barriers. Both GM and WM imaging measures correlated with estimated years to onset. CONCLUSIONS: Using automated, observer-independent methods, we found that GM loss in pre-HD was regionally specific, while WM deterioration was much more general and probably the result of demyelination rather then axonal degeneration. These findings provide important information about the nature, relative staging, and topographic specificity of brain changes in pre-HD and suggest that combining GM and WM imaging may be the best biomarker approach. The empirically derived group difference images from this study are provided as regions-of-interest masks for improved sensitivity in future longitudinal studies.
BACKGROUND: In Huntington disease (HD), substantial striatal atrophy precedes clinical motor symptoms. Accordingly, neuroprotection should prevent major cell loss before such symptoms arise. To evaluate neuroprotection, biomarkers such as MRI measures are needed. This requires first establishing the best imaging approach. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, we acquired T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted scans in 39 preclinical (pre-HD) individuals and 25 age-matched controls. T1-weighted scans were analyzed with gross whole-brain segmentation and voxel-based morphometry. Analysis of diffusion-weighted scans used skeleton-based tractography. For all imaging measures, we compared pre-HD and control groups and within the pre-HD group we examined correlations with estimated years to clinical onset. RESULTS: Pre-HD individuals had lower gross gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volume. Voxel-wise analysis demonstrated local GM volume loss, most notably in regions consistent with basal ganglia-thalamocortical pathways. By contrast, pre-HD individuals showed widespread reductions in WM integrity, probably due to a loss of axonal barriers. Both GM and WM imaging measures correlated with estimated years to onset. CONCLUSIONS: Using automated, observer-independent methods, we found that GM loss in pre-HD was regionally specific, while WM deterioration was much more general and probably the result of demyelination rather then axonal degeneration. These findings provide important information about the nature, relative staging, and topographic specificity of brain changes in pre-HD and suggest that combining GM and WM imaging may be the best biomarker approach. The empirically derived group difference images from this study are provided as regions-of-interest masks for improved sensitivity in future longitudinal studies.
Authors: E Gómez-Tortosa; M E MacDonald; J C Friend; S A Taylor; L J Weiler; L A Cupples; J Srinidhi; J F Gusella; E D Bird; J P Vonsattel; R H Myers Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Yongyue Zhang; Mark Jenkinson; Jacqueline Chen; P M Matthews; Antonio Federico; Nicola De Stefano Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: E H Aylward; A M Codori; A Rosenblatt; M Sherr; J Brandt; O C Stine; P E Barta; G D Pearlson; C A Ross Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: M J Thieben; A J Duggins; C D Good; L Gomes; N Mahant; F Richards; E McCusker; R S J Frackowiak Journal: Brain Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: D S Adnan Majid; Adam R Aron; Wesley Thompson; Sarah Sheldon; Samar Hamza; Diederick Stoffers; Dominic Holland; Jody Goldstein; Jody Corey-Bloom; Anders M Dale Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Joseph J Shaffer; Ali Ghayoor; Jeffrey D Long; Regina Eun-Young Kim; Spencer Lourens; Lauren J O'Donnell; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Yogesh Rathi; Vincent Magnotta; Jane S Paulsen; Hans J Johnson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Christopher W Hess; Edward Ofori; Umer Akbar; Michael S Okun; David E Vaillancourt Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Deborah L Harrington; Jeffrey D Long; Sally Durgerian; Lyla Mourany; Katherine Koenig; Aaron Bonner-Jackson; Jane S Paulsen; Stephen M Rao Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Eduardo E Arteaga-Bracho; Maria Gulinello; Michael L Winchester; Nandini Pichamoorthy; Jenna R Petronglo; Alicia D Zambrano; Julio Inocencio; Chirstopher D De Jesus; Joseph O Louie; Solen Gokhan; Mark F Mehler; Aldrin E Molero Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2016-09-10 Impact factor: 5.996