PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive value of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for late side effects of the rectum, sigmoid colon, and bladder in image-guided brachytherapy for cervix cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 141 patients received external-beam radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy. The DVH parameters for the most exposed 2, 1, and 0.1 cm(3) (D(2cc), D(1cc), and D(0.1cc)) of the rectum, sigmoid, and bladder, as well as International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements point doses (D(ICRU)) were computed. Total doses were converted to equivalent doses in 2 Gy by applying the linear-quadratic model (α/β = 3 Gy). Late side effects were prospectively assessed using the Late Effects in Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic score. The following patient groups were defined: Group 1: no side effects (Grade 0); Group 2: side effects (Grade 1-4); Group 3: minor side effects (Grade 0-1); and Group 4: major side effects (Grade 2-4). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 51 months. The overall 5-year actuarial side effect rates were 12% for rectum, 3% for sigmoid, and 23% for bladder. The mean total D(2cc) were 65 ± 12 Gy for rectum, 62 ± 12 Gy for sigmoid, and 95 ± 22 Gy for bladder. For rectum, statistically significant differences were observed between Groups 1 and 2 in all DVH parameters and D(ICRU). Between Groups 3 and 4, no difference was observed for D(0.1cc). For sigmoid, significant differences were observed for D(2cc) and D(1cc), but not for D(0.1cc) in all groups. For bladder, significant differences were observed for all DVH parameters only comparing Groups 3 and 4. No differences were observed for D(ICRU). CONCLUSIONS: The parameters D(2cc) and D(1cc) have a good predictive value for rectal toxicity. For sigmoid, no prediction could be postulated because of limited data. In bladder, DVH parameters were predictive only for major toxicity. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive value of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for late side effects of the rectum, sigmoid colon, and bladder in image-guided brachytherapy for cervix cancerpatients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 141 patients received external-beam radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy. The DVH parameters for the most exposed 2, 1, and 0.1 cm(3) (D(2cc), D(1cc), and D(0.1cc)) of the rectum, sigmoid, and bladder, as well as International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements point doses (D(ICRU)) were computed. Total doses were converted to equivalent doses in 2 Gy by applying the linear-quadratic model (α/β = 3 Gy). Late side effects were prospectively assessed using the Late Effects in Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic score. The following patient groups were defined: Group 1: no side effects (Grade 0); Group 2: side effects (Grade 1-4); Group 3: minor side effects (Grade 0-1); and Group 4: major side effects (Grade 2-4). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 51 months. The overall 5-year actuarial side effect rates were 12% for rectum, 3% for sigmoid, and 23% for bladder. The mean total D(2cc) were 65 ± 12 Gy for rectum, 62 ± 12 Gy for sigmoid, and 95 ± 22 Gy for bladder. For rectum, statistically significant differences were observed between Groups 1 and 2 in all DVH parameters and D(ICRU). Between Groups 3 and 4, no difference was observed for D(0.1cc). For sigmoid, significant differences were observed for D(2cc) and D(1cc), but not for D(0.1cc) in all groups. For bladder, significant differences were observed for all DVH parameters only comparing Groups 3 and 4. No differences were observed for D(ICRU). CONCLUSIONS: The parameters D(2cc) and D(1cc) have a good predictive value for rectal toxicity. For sigmoid, no prediction could be postulated because of limited data. In bladder, DVH parameters were predictive only for major toxicity. Copyright Â
Authors: Qiyong Fan; Anamaria R Yeung; Robert Amdur; Richard Helmig; Justin Park; Jonathan Li; Darren Kahler; Chihray Liu; Bo Lu Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-02-10
Authors: Akila N Viswanathan; Sushil Beriwal; Jennifer F De Los Santos; D Jeffrey Demanes; David Gaffney; Jorgen Hansen; Ellen Jones; Christian Kirisits; Bruce Thomadsen; Beth Erickson Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Peter Paximadis; Matthew Schipper; Martha Matuszak; Mary Feng; Shruti Jolly; Thomas Boike; Inga Grills; Larry Kestin; Benjamin Movsas; Kent Griffith; Gregory Gustafson; Jean Moran; Teamour Nurushev; Jeffrey Radawski; Lori Pierce; James Hayman Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2017-07-19
Authors: Antonio L Damato; Kanopkis Townamchai; Michele Albert; Ryan J Bair; Robert A Cormack; Joanne Jang; Arpad Kovacs; Larissa J Lee; Kimberley S Mak; Kristina L Mirabeau-Beale; Kent W Mouw; John G Phillips; Jennifer L Pretz; Andrea L Russo; John H Lewis; Akila N Viswanathan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-05-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: P Georg; A Boni; A Ghabuous; G Goldner; M P Schmid; D Georg; R Pötter; W Dörr Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 3.621