Literature DB >> 20384232

A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography.

Nicole T Ranger1, Joseph Y Lo, Ehsan Samei.   

Abstract

Digital mammography requires revisiting techniques that have been optimized for prior screen/film mammography systems. The objective of the study was to determine optimized radiographic technique for a digital mammography system and demonstrate the potential for dose reduction in comparison to the clinically established techniques based on screen- film. An objective figure of merit (FOM) was employed to evaluate a direct-conversion amorphous selenium (a-Se) FFDM system (Siemens Mammomat Novation(DR), Siemens AG Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) and was derived from the quotient of the squared signal-difference-to-noise ratio to mean glandular dose, for various combinations of technique factors and breast phantom configurations including kilovoltage settings (23-35 kVp), target/filter combinations (Mo-Mo and W-Rh), breast-equivalent plastic in various thicknesses (2-8 cm) and densities (100% adipose, 50% adipose/50% glandular, and 100% glandular), and simulated mass and calcification lesions. When using a W-Rh spectrum, the optimized FOM results for the simulated mass and calcification lesions showed highly consistent trends with kVp for each combination of breast density and thickness. The optimized kVp ranged from 26 kVp for 2 cm 100% adipose breasts to 30 kVp for 8 cm 100% glandular breasts. The use of the optimized W-Rh technique compared to standard Mo-Mo techniques provided dose savings ranging from 9% for 2 cm thick, 100% adipose breasts, to 63% for 6 cm thick, 100% glandular breasts, and for breasts with a 50% adipose/50% glandular composition, from 12% for 2 cm thick breasts up to 57% for 8 cm thick breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20384232      PMCID: PMC2830259          DOI: 10.1118/1.3276732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  D R Dance; A K Thilander; M Sandborg; C L Skinner; I A Castellano; G A Carlsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system.

Authors:  S Muller
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  New digital mammography systems may require different X-ray spectra and, therefore, more general normalized glandular dose values.

Authors:  C Kimme-Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  [Full-field digital mammography: dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis].

Authors:  S Obenauer; K P Hermann; C Schorn; U Fischer; E Grabbe
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2000-12

5.  Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.

Authors:  Eric A Berns; R Edward Hendrick; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?

Authors:  Walter Huda; Anthony M Sajewicz; Kent M Ogden; Ernest M Scalzetti; David R Dance
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.

Authors:  S Obenauer; K-P Hermann; E Grabbe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Digital mammography.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Fewell; R J Jennings
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Jurgen Jacobs; Chantal Van Ongeval; Filip Claus; Valerie Celis; Catherine Geniets; Veerle Provost; Herman Pauwels; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of mean glandular dose and modulation transfer function for different tube potentials and target-filter combinations in computed radiography mammography.

Authors:  Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz; Abdul Khaliq Mohd Saparudin; Ahmad Zaky Harun
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2013-05

2.  Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Agnes M F Fausto; M C Lopes; M C de Sousa; Tânia A C Furquim; Anderson W Mol; Fermin G Velasco
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Stephen L Hillis; Filip Claus; Chantal Van Ongeval; Valerie Celis; Veerle Provoost; Hong-Jun Yoon; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.

Authors:  Sung Ui Shin; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Su Hyun Lee; Nariya Cho; Mirinae Seo; Won Hwa Kim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  European trends in radiology: investigating factors affecting the number of examinations and the effective dose.

Authors:  Hamidreza Masjedi; Mohammad Hosein Zare; Neda Keshavarz Siahpoush; Seid Kazem Razavi-Ratki; Fatemeh Alavi; Masoud Shabani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Use of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities in Modern Screening, Diagnostics and Management of Breast Tumours 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gábor Forrai; Eszter Kovács; Éva Ambrózay; Miklós Barta; Katalin Borbély; Zsolt Lengyel; Katalin Ormándi; Zoltán Péntek; Tasnádi Tünde; Éva Sebő
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.874

7.  Dose reduction in automatic optimization parameter of full field digital mammography: breast phantom study.

Authors:  Myung-Su Ko; Hak Hee Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Jeoung Hyun Kim; Min Jeong Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.588

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.