Literature DB >> 10477095

Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system.

S Muller1.   

Abstract

Although mammography is currently considered by many to be the best tool for the early detection of breast cancer, conventional film-screen imaging is still far from perfect. A fundamental limitation of film-screen mammography is the fact that the detection, display and storage devices are one and the same, making it impossible to separately optimize each device. In addition to a potentially equivalent or better image quality compared to the film-screen technology, full-field digital mammography (FFDM) will provide the radiologist with numerous advantages: digital image management, digital data transfer and new medical applications. Nevertheless, to fulfil the potential of digital mammography, an FFDM unit must not only provide an outstanding technology for X-ray detection, but should be designed as a complete system. Each component of the FFDM system should be designed to provide or to increase the current image quality, the current ease of use and the current throughput: the X-ray tube, the gantry, the image receptor packaging, the detector, the acquisition electronics, the softcopy review workstation, the user interface, as well as the network capabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10477095     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(99)00066-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  7 in total

1.  Soft copy versus hard copy reading in digital mammography.

Authors:  Silvia Obenauer; Klaus-Peter Hermann; Katharina Marten; Susanne Luftner-Nagel; Dorit von Heyden; Per Skaane; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Xinming Liu; Chao-Jen Lai; Gary J Whitman; William R Geiser; Youtao Shen; Ying Yi; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography.

Authors:  Nicole T Ranger; Joseph Y Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges.

Authors:  A Noel; F Thibault
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Silvia Obenauer; Christian Sohns; Carola Werner; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Patient dose in full-field digital mammography: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Paola Baldelli; Angelo Taibi; Cosimo Di Maggio; Mauro Gambaccini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.