Literature DB >> 23061805

Potential anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for central retinal vein occlusion.

Marta S Figueroa1, Inés Contreras.   

Abstract

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) remains an important cause of visual loss. Impaired venous drainage leads to retinal hypoxia with upregulation and release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF increases vascular permeability and leads to the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier, with the development of macular oedema. Treatment strategies for macular oedema in CRVO currently under evaluation focus on VEGF blockage. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks VEGF. It has been evaluated in a clinical trial that compared intravitreal injections of bevacizumab 1.25 mg with sham injections every 6 weeks. At the end of a 24-week follow-up period, 60.0% of patients in the bevacizumab group had gained ≥ 15 letters compared with 20.0% in the control group (p=0.003). Aflibercept (previously VEGF Trap-Eye) is a 115  kD decoy receptor fusion protein. Aflibercept is capable of binding both VEGF and placental growth factor (PlGF). By blocking both VEGF and PlGF, aflibercept could be more effective than other anti-VEGF drugs. Two clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of aflibercept for the treatment of macular oedema in CRVO: COPERNICUS and GALILEO. Both included a similar 6-month phase, during which patients were randomized to receive either an intravitreal injection of aflibercept 2 mg or a sham injection every month. In a second 6-month phase of the GALILEO study, patients in the treatment group were treated on an as needed (PRN) basis with aflibercept, while patients in the placebo group continued with sham injections. In the second 6-month phase in the COPERNICUS study, all patients were treated with aflibercept on a PRN basis. Treatment with aflibercept led to an improvement in visual acuity of ≥ 15 letters in 55.3% (COPERNICUS) and 60.2% of patients (GALILEO). Patients initially in the placebo group and then treated PRN gained only a mean of 3.8 letters, with 30.1% achieving a visual gain of ≥ 15 letters (COPERNICUS). The percentage of patients that improved by ≥ 15 letters was 32.4% for the group receiving sham injections throughout the GALILEO study. In summary, VEGF blockage has been proven to improve visual outcomes in patients with macular oedema due to CRVO. However, an important disadvantage of anti-VEGF drugs is the need for frequent reinjections and even more frequent control visits. Further advances are needed in order to improve quality of life and reduce the burden to healthcare systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23061805     DOI: 10.2165/11640820-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  26 in total

1.  Baseline predictors of visual acuity and retinal thickness outcomes in patients with retinal vein occlusion: Standard Care Versus COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion Study report 10.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Geoff Cohen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  Natural history of central retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel L McIntosh; Sophie L Rogers; Lyndell Lim; Ning Cheung; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; Jonathan W Kowalski; Hiep P Nguyen; Tien Yin Wong
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Bevacizumab for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion: a prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical study.

Authors:  David L J Epstein; Peep V Algvere; Gunvor von Wendt; Stefan Seregard; Anders Kvanta
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Intravitreal bevacizumab in central retinal vein occlusion: 18-month results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Peep V Algvere; David Epstein; Gunvor von Wendt; Stefan Seregard; Anders Kvanta
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: six-month primary end point results of a phase III study.

Authors:  David M Brown; Peter A Campochiaro; Rishi P Singh; Zhengrong Li; Sarah Gray; Namrata Saroj; Amy Chen Rundle; Roman G Rubio; Wendy Yee Murahashi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with macular edema related to branch or central retinal vein occlusion twelve-month study results.

Authors:  Julia A Haller; Francesco Bandello; Rubens Belfort; Mark S Blumenkranz; Mark Gillies; Jeffrey Heier; Anat Loewenstein; Young Hee Yoon; Jenny Jiao; Xiao-Yan Li; Scott M Whitcup; Joanne Li
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Biological, preclinical and clinical characteristics of inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factors.

Authors:  Victor Chong
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  VEGF-Trap: a VEGF blocker with potent antitumor effects.

Authors:  Jocelyn Holash; Sam Davis; Nick Papadopoulos; Susan D Croll; Lillian Ho; Michelle Russell; Patricia Boland; Ray Leidich; Donna Hylton; Elena Burova; Ella Ioffe; Tammy Huang; Czeslaw Radziejewski; Kevin Bailey; James P Fandl; Tom Daly; Stanley J Wiegand; George D Yancopoulos; John S Rudge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders.

Authors:  L P Aiello; R L Avery; P G Arrigg; B A Keyt; H D Jampel; S T Shah; L R Pasquale; H Thieme; M A Iwamoto; J E Park
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Intravitreal ranibizumab versus aflibercept versus bevacizumab for macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the LEAVO non-inferiority three-arm RCT.

Authors:  Philip Hykin; A Toby Prevost; Sobha Sivaprasad; Joana C Vasconcelos; Caroline Murphy; Joanna Kelly; Jayashree Ramu; Abualbishr Alshreef; Laura Flight; Rebekah Pennington; Barry Hounsome; Ellen Lever; Andrew Metry; Edith Poku; Yit Yang; Simon P Harding; Andrew Lotery; Usha Chakravarthy; John Brazier
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea(®)): a review of its use in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang; Kate McKeage
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Ranibizumab for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a meta-analysis of dose effects and comparison with no anti-VEGF treatment.

Authors:  Wei-tao Song; Xiao-bo Xia
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.