Literature DB >> 26498434

The Effects of Stroke Type, Locus, and Extent on Long-Term Outcome of Gait Rehabilitation: The LEAPS Experience.

Stephen E Nadeau1, Bruce Dobkin2, Samuel S Wu3, Qinglin Pei3, Pamela W Duncan4.   

Abstract

Background Paresis in stroke is largely a result of damage to descending corticospinal and corticobulbar pathways. Recovery of paresis predominantly reflects the impact on the neural consequences of this white matter lesion by reactive neuroplasticity (mechanisms involved in spontaneous recovery) and experience-dependent neuroplasticity, driven by therapy and daily experience. However, both theoretical considerations and empirical data suggest that type of stroke (large vessel distribution/lacunar infarction, hemorrhage), locus and extent of infarction (basal ganglia, right-hemisphere cerebral cortex), and the presence of leukoaraiosis or prior stroke might influence long-term recovery of walking ability. In this secondary analysis based on the 408 participants in the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke (LEAPS) study database, we seek to address these possibilities. Methods Lesion type, locus, and extent were characterized by the 2 neurologists in the LEAPS trial on the basis of clinical computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans. A series of regression models was used to test our hypotheses regarding the effects of lesion type, locus, extent, and laterality on 2- to 12-month change in gait speed, controlling for baseline gait speed, age, and Berg Balance Scale score. Results Gait speed change at 1 year was significantly reduced in participants with basal ganglia involvement and prior stroke. There was a trend toward reduction of gait speed change in participants with lacunar infarctions. The presence of right-hemisphere cortical involvement had no significant impact on outcome. Conclusions Type, locus, and extent of lesion, and the loss of substrate for neuroplastic effect as a result of prior stroke may affect long-term outcome of rehabilitation of hemiparetic gait.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gait; hemiparesis; lesion locus; rehabilitation; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26498434      PMCID: PMC4842161          DOI: 10.1177/1545968315613851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  54 in total

Review 1.  Impact of neglect on functional outcome after stroke: a review of methodological issues and recent research findings.

Authors:  M Jehkonen; M Laihosalo; J E Kettunen
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Anosognosia after stroke: assessment, occurrence, subtypes and impact on functional outcome reviewed.

Authors:  M Jehkonen; M Laihosalo; J Kettunen
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques.

Authors:  T P Pons; P E Garraghty; A K Ommaya; J H Kaas; E Taub; M Mishkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Characterizing and identifying risk for falls in the LEAPS study: a randomized clinical trial of interventions to improve walking poststroke.

Authors:  Julie K Tilson; Samuel S Wu; Steven Y Cen; Qiushi Feng; Dorian R Rose; Andrea L Behrman; Stanley P Azen; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  The frequency, clinical correlates, and mechanism of anosognosia after stroke.

Authors:  Sergio E Starkstein; Ricardo E Jorge; Robert G Robinson
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Somatotopically located motor fibers in corona radiata: evidence from subcortical small infarcts.

Authors:  Jong S Kim; Amy Pope
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Functional recovery after hemiplegia in patients with neglect: the rehabilitative role of anosognosia.

Authors:  Bernardo Gialanella; Vittoria Monguzzi; Raffaele Santoro; Silvana Rocchi
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Clinicotopographical correlation of corticospinal tract stroke: a color-coded diffusion tensor imaging study.

Authors:  C Lie; J G Hirsch; C Rossmanith; M G Hennerici; A Gass
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Effects of task-specific and impairment-based training compared with usual care on functional walking ability after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: LEAPS Trial.

Authors:  Stephen E Nadeau; Samuel S Wu; Bruce H Dobkin; Stanley P Azen; Dorian K Rose; Julie K Tilson; Steven Y Cen; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Protocol for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-stroke (LEAPS) trial: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pamela W Duncan; Katherine J Sullivan; Andrea L Behrman; Stanley P Azen; Samuel S Wu; Stephen E Nadeau; Bruce H Dobkin; Dorian K Rose; Julie K Tilson
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 2.474

View more
  10 in total

1.  Leukoaraiosis Predicts Short-term Cognitive But not Motor Recovery in Ischemic Stroke Patients During Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Muhib Khan; Heather Heiser; Nathan Bernicchi; Laurel Packard; Jessica L Parker; Matthew A Edwardson; Brian Silver; Kost V Elisevich; Nils Henninger
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Stroke Lesions in a Large Upper Limb Rehabilitation Trial Cohort Rarely Match Lesions in Common Preclinical Models.

Authors:  Matthew A Edwardson; Ximing Wang; Brent Liu; Li Ding; Christianne J Lane; Caron Park; Monica A Nelsen; Theresa A Jones; Steven L Wolf; Carolee J Winstein; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Ventilatory threshold may be a more specific measure of aerobic capacity than peak oxygen consumption rate in persons with stroke.

Authors:  Pierce Boyne; Darcy Reisman; Michael Brian; Brian Barney; Ava Franke; Daniel Carl; Jane Khoury; Kari Dunning
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 4.  Recovery and Rehabilitation after Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Michael F Saulle; Heidi M Schambra
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.420

5.  Combined real-time fMRI and real time fNIRS brain computer interface (BCI): Training of volitional wrist extension after stroke, a case series pilot study.

Authors:  Avi K Matarasso; Jake D Rieke; Keith White; M Minhal Yusufali; Janis J Daly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Perceptions of physical activity and walking in an early stage after stroke or acquired brain injury.

Authors:  Karin Törnbom; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Anna Danielsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Environmental enrichment during the chronic phase after experimental stroke promotes functional recovery without synergistic effects of EphA4 targeted therapy.

Authors:  Antina de Boer; Annet Storm; Maricel Gomez-Soler; Silke Smolders; Laura Rué; Lindsay Poppe; Elena B Pasquale; Wim Robberecht; Robin Lemmens
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Sensor-based categorization of upper limb performance in daily life of persons with and without neurological upper limb deficits.

Authors:  Jessica Barth; Keith R Lohse; Jeffrey D Konrad; Marghuertta D Bland; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-10-20

Review 9.  Understanding the Mechanisms of Recovery and/or Compensation following Injury.

Authors:  Michael J Hylin; Abigail L Kerr; Ryan Holden
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Phosphodiesterase 10A Inhibition Leads to Brain Region-Specific Recovery Based on Stroke Type.

Authors:  Shirin Z Birjandi; Nora Abduljawad; Shyama Nair; Morteza Dehghani; Kazunori Suzuki; Haruhide Kimura; S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.829

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.