Literature DB >> 2037857

Factors encouraging cohort maintenance in a longitudinal study.

J K Marmor1, S A Oliveria, R P Donahue, E J Garrahie, M J White, L L Moore, R C Ellison.   

Abstract

Maintenance of the cohort is one of the primary challenges of a longitudinal study. At the end of 3 years of follow up in the Framingham Children's Study, a longitudinal study of young children and their parents, 100 of the original 106 families (94.3%) have remained in the study. A questionnaire was administered to identify factors contributing to the high rate of follow up to this point in the study. The attitudes of the staff, feedback to the subjects, the staff's handling of questions and problems, and association with the Framingham Heart Study emerged as the most important factors influencing continued participation in the study. In addition, 99% of the subjects stated that they believed the medical research to be important. We conclude that the quality of the communication with study participants and the subjects' perceived importance of the research have been the key factors in maintaining the cohort in this longitudinal epidemiologic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2037857     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90216-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  14 in total

1.  A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers.

Authors:  Christy K Scott
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  OPERATIONAL LESSONS FROM THE PATHWAYS TO DESISTANCE PROJECT.

Authors:  Carol A Schubert; Edward P Mulvey; Laurence Steinberg; Elizabeth Cauffman; Sandra H Losoya; Thomas Hecker; Laurie Chassin; George P Knight
Journal:  Youth Violence Juv Justice       Date:  2004-01-01

3.  Strategies for conducting adolescent health research in the clinical setting: the Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center HPV experience.

Authors:  Debra K Braun-Courville; Nicolas F Schlecht; Robert D Burk; Howard D Strickler; Mary Rojas; Elizabeth Lorde-Rollins; Anne Nucci-Sack; Dominic Hollman; L Oriana Linares; Angela Diaz
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 1.814

4.  How to optimize participant retention and complete follow-up in surgical research.

Authors:  Manrajr Kaur; Sheila Sprague; Teegan Ignacy; Achilles Thoma; Mohit Bhandari; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Participant characteristics and study features associated with high retention rates in a longitudinal investigation of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  John R Kramer; Margaret L Bayless; Gayle M Lorenzi; Georgia K Ziegler; Mary E Larkin; Mary E Lackaye; Judith Harth; Lisa J Diminick; Karen L Anderson; Barbara H Braffett; Patricia A Cleary
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Feasibility of a longitudinal study of women anticipating first pregnancy and assessed by multiple pelvic exams: recruitment and retention challenges.

Authors:  Ruth Zielinski; Kelly Ackerson; Ruta B Misiunas; Janis M Miller
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Tracking inner city substance users from the emergency department: how many contacts does it take?

Authors:  Rebecca Cunningham; Maureen A Walton; Shanti P Tripathi; Ryan Outman; Regan Murray; Brenda M Booth
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Recruitment and retention of subjects for a longitudinal cancer prevention study in an inner-city black community.

Authors:  D S Blumenthal; J Sung; R Coates; J Williams; J Liff
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Tracking Assault-injured, Drug-using Youth in Longitudinal Research: Follow-up Methods.

Authors:  Jessica S Roche; Michael J Clery; Patrick M Carter; Aaron Dora-Laskey; Maureen A Walton; Quyen M Ngo; Rebecca M Cunningham
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Determinants of subject visit participation in a prospective cohort study of HTLV infection.

Authors:  Deborah A DeVita; Mary C White; Xin Zhao; Zhanna Kaidarova; Edward L Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.