Literature DB >> 18275443

Tracking inner city substance users from the emergency department: how many contacts does it take?

Rebecca Cunningham1, Maureen A Walton, Shanti P Tripathi, Ryan Outman, Regan Murray, Brenda M Booth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies of substance users report difficulty in locating and completing 12-month interviews, which may compromise study validity.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined rates and predictors of contact difficulty and in-person follow-up completion among patients presenting with cocaine-related chest pain to an inner-city emergency department (ED). The authors hypothesize that less staff effort in contacting patients and lower follow-up rates would bias subsequent substance use analysis by missing those with heavier substance misuse.
METHODS: A total of 219 patients aged 19 to 60 years (65% males; 78% African American) with cocaine-related chest pain were interviewed in the ED and then in person at 3, 6, and 12 months. Demographics, substance use measures, and amount/type of research staff contacts (telephone, letters, home visits, and locating patient during return ED visits) were recorded. Poisson and negative binomial regression analyses were conducted to predict quantity of patient contacts for the 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Interview completion rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 78, 82, and 80%, respectively. Average contact attempts to obtain each interview were 10 at 3 months (range 3-44), 8 at 6 months (1-31), and 8 at 12 months (1-49); 13% of patients required a home visit to complete the 12-month interview. Participants requiring more contact attempts by staff were younger and reported more frequent binge drinking at baseline (p < 0.05), but were less likely to meet criteria for substance abuse or dependence (p < 0.5), or to report prior mental health treatment (p < 0.05). Comparisons of parallel regressions predicting contact difficulty based on the entire sample, the low-effort group, and the difficult-to-reach group showed variation in findings.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that substantial staff effort is required to achieve adequate retention over 12 months of patients with substance misuse. Without these extensive efforts at follow-up, longitudinal analyses may be biased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18275443      PMCID: PMC2658529          DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00033.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  25 in total

1.  Adjusting for drop-out in clinical trials with repeated measures: design and analysis issues.

Authors:  M C Wu; P S Albert; B U Wu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Correlates of treatment follow-up difficulty.

Authors:  Susanna Nemes; Eric Wish; Brook Wraight; Nena Messina
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study of substance abusers.

Authors:  Ronald E Claus; Lisa R Kindleberger; Mary C Dugan
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Research fundamentals: follow-up of subjects in clinical trials: addressing subject attrition.

Authors:  Robert H Woolard; Kathleen Carty; Philip Wirtz; Richard Longabaugh; Ted D Nirenberg; P Allison Minugh; Bruce Becker; Patrick R Clifford
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers.

Authors:  Christy K Scott
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Factors encouraging cohort maintenance in a longitudinal study.

Authors:  J K Marmor; S A Oliveria; R P Donahue; E J Garrahie; M J White; L L Moore; R C Ellison
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: a comprehensive substance abuse interview.

Authors:  L B Cottler; L N Robins; J E Helzer
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1989-07

8.  Early detection of harmful alcohol consumption: comparison of clinical, laboratory, and self-report screening procedures.

Authors:  T F Babor; H R Kranzler; R J Lauerman
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Drawing women into prenatal care.

Authors:  S S Brown
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr

10.  Predictors of loss to follow-up in young patients with minor trauma after screening and written intervention for alcohol in an urban emergency department.

Authors:  Bruno Neuner; Michael Fleming; Rike Born; Edith Weiss-Gerlach; Tim Neumann; Jordan Rettig; Alexandra Lau; Helge Schoenfeld; Gerd Kallischnigg; Claudia Spies
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.582

View more
  8 in total

1.  Recruiting and retaining low-income, multi-ethnic women into randomized controlled trials: successful strategies and staffing.

Authors:  Josephine Barnett; Stephanie Aguilar; Mindy Brittner; Karen Bonuck
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Predictors of violence following Emergency Department visit for cocaine-related chest pain.

Authors:  Maureen A Walton; Rebecca Cunningham; Stephen T Chermack; Shanti Tripathi; James Weber; Ronald F Maio; Brenda M Booth
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Collaborative care from the emergency department for injured patients with prescription drug misuse: An open feasibility study.

Authors:  Lauren K Whiteside; Doyanne Darnell; Karlee Jackson; Jin Wang; Joan Russo; Dennis M Donovan; Douglas F Zatzick
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-08-24

4.  Tracking Assault-injured, Drug-using Youth in Longitudinal Research: Follow-up Methods.

Authors:  Jessica S Roche; Michael J Clery; Patrick M Carter; Aaron Dora-Laskey; Maureen A Walton; Quyen M Ngo; Rebecca M Cunningham
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Ability to Reach Low-Income Smokers Enrolled in a Randomised Controlled Trial Varies with Time of Month.

Authors:  Kathryn Hawk; Ruizhi Shi; June Weiss; Robert Makuch; Benjamin Toll; Steven L Bernstein
Journal:  J Smok Cessat       Date:  2017-11-28

6.  The efficacy of behavioural activation treatment for co-occurring depression and substance use disorder (the activate study): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joanne Ross; Maree Teesson; Carl Lejuez; Katherine Mills; Sharlene Kaye; Kathleen Brady; Glenys Dore; Katrina Prior; Xanthe Larkin; Joanne Cassar; Philippa Ewer; Sonja Memedovic; Ivana Kihas; Sarah Louise Masters
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Feasibility and acceptability of electronic administration of patient reported outcomes using mHealth platform in emergency department patients with non-medical opioid use.

Authors:  Kathryn Hawk; Caitlin Malicki; Jeremiah Kinsman; Gail D'Onofrio; Andrew Taylor; Arjun Venkatesh
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2021-11-10

8.  Technological aids for improving longitudinal research on substance use disorders.

Authors:  David Farabee; Marya Schulte; Rachel Gonzales; Christine E Grella
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.