Literature DB >> 20376282

Evaluation on lung cancer patients' adaptive planning of TomoTherapy utilising radiobiological measures and Planned Adaptive module.

Fan-Chi Su1, Chengyu Shi, Panayiotis Mavroidis, Prema Rassiah-Szegedi, Niko Papanikolaou.   

Abstract

Adaptive radiation therapy is a promising concept that allows individualised, dynamic treatment planning based on feedback of measurements. The TomoTherapy Planned Adaptive application, integrated to the helical TomoTherapy planning system, enables calculation of actual dose delivered to the patient for each treatment fraction according to the pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) scan and image registration. As a result, new fractionation treatment plans are available if correction is necessary. In order to evaluate therealclinicaleffect,biologicaldoseis preferred to physical dose. A biological parameter, biologically effective uniform dose ([Formula: see text]), has the advantages of not only reporting delivered dose but also facilitating the analysis of dose-response relations, which link radiation dose to the clinical effect. Therefore, in this study, four lung patients' adaptive plans were evaluated using the [Formula: see text] in addition to physical doses estimated from the TomoTherapy Planned Adaptive module. Higher complication-free tumour control probability (P(+))(of about 8%) was observed in patients treated with larger dose-per-fraction by using the [Formula: see text] in addition to the physical dose. Moreover, a significant increase of 13.2% in the P(+) for the adaptive TomoTherapy plan in one of the lung cancer patients was also observed, which indicates the clinical benefit of adaptive TomoTherapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20376282      PMCID: PMC2849164          DOI: 10.1017/S1460396909990240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiother Pract        ISSN: 1460-3969


  19 in total

1.  Tolerance levels for quality assurance of electron density values generated from CT in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Warren Kilby; John Sage; Vicki Rabett
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas Rockwell Mackie; Jeff Kapatoes; Ken Ruchala; Weiguo Lu; Chuan Wu; Gustavo Olivera; Lisa Forrest; Wolfgang Tome; Jim Welsh; Robert Jeraj; Paul Harari; Paul Reckwerdt; Bhudatt Paliwal; Mark Ritter; Harry Keller; Jack Fowler; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Assessing the difference between planned and delivered intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose distributions based on radiobiological measures.

Authors:  P Mavroidis; B C Ferreira; N Papanikotaou; R Svensson; C Kappas; B K Lind; A Brahme
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Biologically effective uniform dose (D) for specification, report and comparison of dose response relations and treatment plans.

Authors:  P Mavroidis; B K Lind; A Brahme
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Tumor volume changes on serial imaging with megavoltage CT for non-small-cell lung cancer during intensity-modulated radiotherapy: how reliable, consistent, and meaningful is the effect?

Authors:  Malika L Siker; Wolfgang A Tomé; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations.

Authors:  K M Langen; S L Meeks; D O Poole; T H Wagner; T R Willoughby; P A Kupelian; K J Ruchala; J Haimerl; G H Olivera
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Adaptive radiotherapy planning on decreasing gross tumor volumes as seen on megavoltage computed tomography images.

Authors:  Curtis Woodford; Slav Yartsev; A Rashid Dar; Glenn Bauman; Jake Van Dyk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.

Authors:  Panayiotis Mavroidis; Brigida Costa Ferreira; Chengyu Shi; Bengt K Lind; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Optimization of megavoltage CT scan registration settings for thoracic cases on helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Curtis Woodford; Slav Yartsev; Jake Van Dyk
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Quantifying appropriate PTV setup margins: analysis of patient setup fidelity and intrafraction motion using post-treatment megavoltage computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Donata M Drabik; Marc A MacKenzie; Gino B Fallone
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.