PURPOSE: Biliary cancers overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and angiogenesis has been correlated with poor outcome. Erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor have each been shown to have activity in biliary cancer. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), VEGF levels, and molecular studies of EGFR and k-ras. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had advanced cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer. Patients were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15 and erlotinib 150 mg by mouth daily on days 1 through 28. Responses were evaluated by RECIST. VEGF levels were collected, and samples were analyzed for EGFR mutation by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Fifty-three eligible patients were enrolled at eight sites. Of 49 evaluable patients, six (12%; 95% CI, 6% to 27%) had a confirmed partial response. Stable disease was documented in another 25 patients (51%). Rash was the most common grade 3 toxicity. Four patients had grade 4 toxicities. Median OS was 9.9 months, and TTP was 4.4 months. Low repeats (< 16) in EGFR intron 1 polymorphism and G>G k-ras Q38 genotype (wild type) were associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib showed clinical activity with infrequent grade 3 and 4 adverse effects in patients with advanced biliary cancers. On the basis of preliminary molecular analysis, presence of a k-ras mutation may alter erlotinib efficacy. The combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib may be a therapeutic alternative in patients with advanced biliary cancer.
PURPOSE:Biliary cancers overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and angiogenesis has been correlated with poor outcome. Erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor have each been shown to have activity in biliary cancer. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), VEGF levels, and molecular studies of EGFR and k-ras. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had advanced cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer. Patients were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15 and erlotinib 150 mg by mouth daily on days 1 through 28. Responses were evaluated by RECIST. VEGF levels were collected, and samples were analyzed for EGFR mutation by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Fifty-three eligible patients were enrolled at eight sites. Of 49 evaluable patients, six (12%; 95% CI, 6% to 27%) had a confirmed partial response. Stable disease was documented in another 25 patients (51%). Rash was the most common grade 3 toxicity. Four patients had grade 4 toxicities. Median OS was 9.9 months, and TTP was 4.4 months. Low repeats (< 16) in EGFR intron 1 polymorphism and G>G k-ras Q38 genotype (wild type) were associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib showed clinical activity with infrequent grade 3 and 4 adverse effects in patients with advanced biliary cancers. On the basis of preliminary molecular analysis, presence of a k-ras mutation may alter erlotinib efficacy. The combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib may be a therapeutic alternative in patients with advanced biliary cancer.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: P Perrotte; T Matsumoto; K Inoue; H Kuniyasu; B Y Eve; D J Hicklin; R Radinsky; C P Dinney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Y D Jung; P F Mansfield; M Akagi; A Takeda; W Liu; C D Bucana; D J Hicklin; L M Ellis Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: T André; C Tournigand; O Rosmorduc; S Provent; F Maindrault-Goebel; D Avenin; F Selle; F Paye; L Hannoun; S Houry; B Gayet; J P Lotz; A de Gramont; C Louvet Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: James C Yang; Leah Haworth; Richard M Sherry; Patrick Hwu; Douglas J Schwartzentruber; Suzanne L Topalian; Seth M Steinberg; Helen X Chen; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-07-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R M Shaheen; S A Ahmad; W Liu; N Reinmuth; Y D Jung; W W Tseng; K E Drazan; C D Bucana; D J Hicklin; L M Ellis Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-08-17 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Siobhan C McKay; Kristian Unger; Stephanos Pericleous; Gordon Stamp; Gerry Thomas; Robert R Hutchins; Duncan R C Spalding Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Michael Postow; Manish A Shah; Maeve Lowery; Ali Shamseddine; Aghiad El-Kutoubi; Ashwaq Al Olayan; Mohamed Naghy; Celina Ang; Sally Tamraz; Abdul-Rahman Jazieh; Eileen M O'Reilly; David P Kelsen; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2012-06
Authors: Guy A Weiss; Michael R Rossi; Nikhil I Khushalani; Ken Lo; John F Gibbs; Anubha Bharthuar; John K Cowell; Renuka Iyer Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2013-03