OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound and neural network data classification for determining the breast cancer response to bevacizumab therapy in a murine model. METHODS: An ultrasound scanner operating in the harmonic mode was used to measure ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) time-intensity curves in vivo. Twenty-five nude athymic mice with orthotopic breast cancers received a 30-microL tail vein bolus of a perflutren microsphere UCA, and baseline tumor imaging was performed using microbubble destruction-replenishment techniques. Subsequently, 15 animals received a 0.2-mg injection of bevacizumab, whereas 10 control animals received an equivalent dose of saline. Animals were reimaged on days 1, 2, 3, and 6 before euthanasia. Histologic assessment of excised tumor sections was performed. Time-intensity curve analysis for a given region of interest was conducted using customized software. Tumor perfusion metrics on days 1, 2, 3, and 6 were modeled using neural network data classification schemes (60% learning and 40% testing) to predict the breast cancer response to therapy. RESULTS: The breast cancer response to a single dose of bevacizumab in a murine model was immediate and transient. Permutations of input to the neural network data classification scheme revealed that tumor perfusion data within 3 days of bevacizumab dosing was sufficient to minimize the prediction error to 10%, whereas measurements of physical tumor size alone did not appear adequate to assess the therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be a useful tool for determining the response to bevacizumab therapy and monitoring the subsequent restoration of blood flow to breast cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound and neural network data classification for determining the breast cancer response to bevacizumab therapy in a murine model. METHODS: An ultrasound scanner operating in the harmonic mode was used to measure ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) time-intensity curves in vivo. Twenty-five nude athymic mice with orthotopic breast cancers received a 30-microL tail vein bolus of a perflutren microsphere UCA, and baseline tumor imaging was performed using microbubble destruction-replenishment techniques. Subsequently, 15 animals received a 0.2-mg injection of bevacizumab, whereas 10 control animals received an equivalent dose of saline. Animals were reimaged on days 1, 2, 3, and 6 before euthanasia. Histologic assessment of excised tumor sections was performed. Time-intensity curve analysis for a given region of interest was conducted using customized software. Tumor perfusion metrics on days 1, 2, 3, and 6 were modeled using neural network data classification schemes (60% learning and 40% testing) to predict the breast cancer response to therapy. RESULTS: The breast cancer response to a single dose of bevacizumab in a murine model was immediate and transient. Permutations of input to the neural network data classification scheme revealed that tumor perfusion data within 3 days of bevacizumab dosing was sufficient to minimize the prediction error to 10%, whereas measurements of physical tumor size alone did not appear adequate to assess the therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be a useful tool for determining the response to bevacizumab therapy and monitoring the subsequent restoration of blood flow to breast cancer.
Authors: William T Shi; Flemming Forsberg; Priya Vaidyanathan; Audun Tornes; Jonny Østensen; Barry B Goldberg Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2006-08-02 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: D Wang; C R Stockard; L Harkins; P Lott; C Salih; K Yuan; D Buchsbaum; A Hashim; M Zayzafoon; R W Hardy; O Hameed; W Grizzle; G P Siegal Journal: Biotech Histochem Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.718
Authors: Paxton V Dickson; John B Hamner; Thomas L Sims; Charles H Fraga; Catherine Y C Ng; Surender Rajasekeran; Nikolaus L Hagedorn; M Beth McCarville; Clinton F Stewart; Andrew M Davidoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: John R Eisenbrey; Christian C Wilson; Raymond J Ro; Traci B Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; See-Ying Chiou; Flemming Forsberg Journal: Ultrasonics Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Shashank R Sirsi; Molly L Flexman; Fotois Vlachos; Jianzhong Huang; Sonia L Hernandez; Hyun Keol Kim; Tessa B Johung; Jeffrey W Gander; Ari R Reichstein; Brooke S Lampl; Antai Wang; Andreas H Hielscher; Jessica J Kandel; Darrell J Yamashiro; Mark A Borden Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Jason M Warram; Anna G Sorace; Reshu Saini; Heidi R Umphrey; Kurt R Zinn; Kenneth Hoyt Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.153