OBJECTIVES: To investigate the separate and combined effects of caregiver status and high stress on mortality risk over 8 years in elderly women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted in four U.S. communities followed from 1999/01 (baseline) to December 31, 2007. SETTING: Home-based interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-five caregiver and 694 noncaregiver participants from the Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (Caregiver-SOF) who participated in the baseline Caregiver-SOF interview. MEASUREMENTS: Caregiver status was based on SOF respondents' self-report of performing one or more instrumental or basic activities of daily living for a relative or friend with impairments. Two measures of stress were used: Perceived Stress Scale and stress related to caregiving tasks. All-cause mortality was the outcome. RESULTS: Caregivers were more stressed than noncaregivers; 19.7% of caregivers and 27.4% of noncaregivers died. Mortality was lower in caregivers than noncaregivers (adjusted hazard ratio, (AHR)=0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.56-0.89). High-stress respondents had greater mortality risk than low-stress respondents over the first 3 years of follow-up (AHR=1.81, 95% CI=1.16-2.82) but not in later years. Likewise, high-stress caregivers and noncaregivers had higher mortality risk than low-stress noncaregivers, although low-stress caregivers had significantly lower mortality than did noncaregivers, whether perceived stress or caregiving-related stress was measured (AHR=0.67 and 0.57). Similar results were observed in analyses comparing spouse caregivers with married noncaregivers. CONCLUSION: Short-term effects of stress, not caregiving per se, may increase the risk of health decline in older caregivers.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the separate and combined effects of caregiver status and high stress on mortality risk over 8 years in elderly women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted in four U.S. communities followed from 1999/01 (baseline) to December 31, 2007. SETTING: Home-based interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-five caregiver and 694 noncaregiver participants from the Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (Caregiver-SOF) who participated in the baseline Caregiver-SOF interview. MEASUREMENTS: Caregiver status was based on SOF respondents' self-report of performing one or more instrumental or basic activities of daily living for a relative or friend with impairments. Two measures of stress were used: Perceived Stress Scale and stress related to caregiving tasks. All-cause mortality was the outcome. RESULTS: Caregivers were more stressed than noncaregivers; 19.7% of caregivers and 27.4% of noncaregivers died. Mortality was lower in caregivers than noncaregivers (adjusted hazard ratio, (AHR)=0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.56-0.89). High-stress respondents had greater mortality risk than low-stress respondents over the first 3 years of follow-up (AHR=1.81, 95% CI=1.16-2.82) but not in later years. Likewise, high-stress caregivers and noncaregivers had higher mortality risk than low-stress noncaregivers, although low-stress caregivers had significantly lower mortality than did noncaregivers, whether perceived stress or caregiving-related stress was measured (AHR=0.67 and 0.57). Similar results were observed in analyses comparing spouse caregivers with married noncaregivers. CONCLUSION: Short-term effects of stress, not caregiving per se, may increase the risk of health decline in older caregivers.
Authors: Lisa Fredman; Sharon Tennstedt; Kathleen A Smyth; Judith D Kasper; Baila Miller; Thomas Fritsch; Maura Watson; Emily L Harris Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2004
Authors: Judith J McCann; Liesi E Hebert; Julia L Bienias; Martha Clare Morris; Denis A Evans Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Philip Greenland; Andrea Z LaCroix; Marcia L Stefanick; Charles P Mouton; Albert Oberman; Michael G Perri; David S Sheps; Mary B Pettinger; David S Siscovick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-09-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth A Chattillion; Brent T Mausbach; Susan K Roepke; Roland von Känel; Paul J Mills; Joel E Dimsdale; Matthew Allison; Michael G Ziegler; Thomas L Patterson; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Igor Grant Journal: Psychol Health Date: 2011-12-12
Authors: Rosanna M Bertrand; Jane S Saczynski; Catherine Mezzacappa; Mallorie Hulse; Kristine Ensrud; Lisa Fredman Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2011-09-20
Authors: Lisa Fredman; Jennifer G Lyons; Jane A Cauley; Marc Hochberg; Katie M Applebaum Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: David L Roth; William E Haley; Martha Hovater; Martinique Perkins; Virginia G Wadley; Suzanne Judd Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Martinique Perkins; Virginia J Howard; Virginia G Wadley; Michael Crowe; Monika M Safford; William E Haley; George Howard; David L Roth Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 4.077