PURPOSE: To assess if segmentation of the aorta can be accurately achieved using the modulus image of phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance (MR) acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC image sequences containing both the ascending and descending aorta of 52 subjects were acquired using three different MR scanners. An automated segmentation technique, based on a 2D+t deformable surface that takes into account the features of PC aortic images, such as flow-related effects, was developed. The study was designed to: 1) assess the variability of our approach and its robustness to the type of MR scanner, and 2) determine its sensitivity to aortic dilation and its accuracy against an expert manual tracing. RESULTS: Interobserver variability in the lumen area was 0.59 +/- 0.92% for the automated approach versus 10.09 +/- 8.29% for manual segmentation. The mean Dice overlap measure was 0.945 +/- 0.014. The method was robust to the aortic size and highly correlated (r = 0.99) with the manual tracing in terms of aortic area and diameter. CONCLUSION: A fast and robust automated segmentation of the aortic lumen was developed and successfully tested on images provided by various MR scanners and acquired on healthy volunteers as well as on patients with a dilated aorta. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To assess if segmentation of the aorta can be accurately achieved using the modulus image of phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance (MR) acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC image sequences containing both the ascending and descending aorta of 52 subjects were acquired using three different MR scanners. An automated segmentation technique, based on a 2D+t deformable surface that takes into account the features of PC aortic images, such as flow-related effects, was developed. The study was designed to: 1) assess the variability of our approach and its robustness to the type of MR scanner, and 2) determine its sensitivity to aortic dilation and its accuracy against an expert manual tracing. RESULTS: Interobserver variability in the lumen area was 0.59 +/- 0.92% for the automated approach versus 10.09 +/- 8.29% for manual segmentation. The mean Dice overlap measure was 0.945 +/- 0.014. The method was robust to the aortic size and highly correlated (r = 0.99) with the manual tracing in terms of aortic area and diameter. CONCLUSION: A fast and robust automated segmentation of the aortic lumen was developed and successfully tested on images provided by various MR scanners and acquired on healthy volunteers as well as on patients with a dilated aorta. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Chikara Noda; Bharath Ambale Venkatesh; Yoshiaki Ohyama; Chia-Ying Liu; Elzbieta Chamera; Alban Redheuil; Gisela Teixido-Tura; Atul R Chugh; Colin O Wu; Gregory W Hundley; David A Bluemke; Joao A C Lima Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Haben Berhane; Michael Scott; Mohammed Elbaz; Kelly Jarvis; Patrick McCarthy; James Carr; Chris Malaisrie; Ryan Avery; Alex J Barker; Joshua D Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Emilie Bollache; Nadjia Kachenoura; Roberto M Lang; Ankit A Desai; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Giovanni Di Leo; Ida Daniela D'Angelo; Marco Alì; Paola Maria Cannaò; Giovanni Mauri; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Yoshiaki Ohyama; Gisela Teixido-Tura; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Chikara Noda; Atul R Chugh; Chia-Ying Liu; Alban Redheuil; R Brandon Stacey; Harry Dietz; Antoinette S Gomes; Martin R Prince; Arturo Evangelista; Colin O Wu; W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; Joao A C Lima Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Akshay Goel; Roderick McColl; Kevin S King; Anthony Whittemore; Ronald M Peshock Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: David Rosenbaum; Nadjia Kachenoura; Edouard Koch; Michel Paques; Philippe Cluzel; Alban Redheuil; Xavier Girerd Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.872