PURPOSE: To assess if fully automated localization of the aorta can be achieved using phase contrast (PC) MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS:PC cardiac-gated MR images were obtained as part of a large population-based study. A fully automated process using the Hough transform was developed to localize the ascending aorta (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo). The study was designed to validate this technique by determining: (i) its performance in localizing the AAo and DAo; (ii) its accuracy in generating AAo flow volume and DAo flow volume; and (iii) its robustness on studies with pathological abnormalities or imaging artifacts. RESULTS: The algorithm was applied successfully on 1884 participants. In the randomly selected 50-study validation set, linear regression shows an excellent correlation between the automated (A) and manual (M) methods for AAo flow (r = 0.99) and DAo flow (r = 0.99). Bland-Altman difference analysis demonstrates strong agreement with minimal bias for: AAo flow (mean difference [A-M] = 0.47 ± 2.53 mL), and DAo flow (mean difference [A-M] = 1.74 ± 2.47 mL). CONCLUSION: A robust fully automated tool to localize the aorta and provide flow volume measurements on phase contrast MRI was validated on a large population-based study.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To assess if fully automated localization of the aorta can be achieved using phase contrast (PC) MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC cardiac-gated MR images were obtained as part of a large population-based study. A fully automated process using the Hough transform was developed to localize the ascending aorta (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo). The study was designed to validate this technique by determining: (i) its performance in localizing the AAo and DAo; (ii) its accuracy in generating AAo flow volume and DAo flow volume; and (iii) its robustness on studies with pathological abnormalities or imaging artifacts. RESULTS: The algorithm was applied successfully on 1884 participants. In the randomly selected 50-study validation set, linear regression shows an excellent correlation between the automated (A) and manual (M) methods for AAo flow (r = 0.99) and DAo flow (r = 0.99). Bland-Altman difference analysis demonstrates strong agreement with minimal bias for: AAo flow (mean difference [A-M] = 0.47 ± 2.53 mL), and DAo flow (mean difference [A-M] = 1.74 ± 2.47 mL). CONCLUSION: A robust fully automated tool to localize the aorta and provide flow volume measurements on phase contrast MRI was validated on a large population-based study.
Authors: Heynric B Grotenhuis; Jos J M Westenberg; Paul Steendijk; Rob J van der Geest; Jaap Ottenkamp; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Albert de Roos Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Bas Versluis; Marjolein H G Dremmen; Patty J Nelemans; Joachim E Wildberger; Geert-Willem Schurink; Tim Leiner; Walter H Backes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Rahil Shahzad; Arun Shankar; Raquel Amier; Robin Nijveldt; Jos J M Westenberg; Albert de Roos; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Rob J van der Geest Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Luca Biasiolli; Evan Hann; Elena Lukaschuk; Valentina Carapella; Jose M Paiva; Nay Aung; Jennifer J Rayner; Konrad Werys; Kenneth Fung; Henrike Puchta; Mihir M Sanghvi; Niall O Moon; Ross J Thomson; Katharine E Thomas; Matthew D Robson; Vicente Grau; Steffen E Petersen; Stefan Neubauer; Stefan K Piechnik Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sebastian Bidhult; Erik Hedström; Marcus Carlsson; Johannes Töger; Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg; Håkan Arheden; Anthony H Aletras; Einar Heiberg Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 2.273