Literature DB >> 20373407

Compressed sensing in hyperpolarized 3He lung MRI.

Salma Ajraoui1, Kuan J Lee, Martin H Deppe, Steven R Parnell, Juan Parra-Robles, Jim M Wild.   

Abstract

In this work, the application of compressed sensing techniques to the acquisition and reconstruction of hyperpolarized (3)He lung MR images was investigated. The sparsity of (3)He lung images in the wavelet domain was investigated through simulations based on fully sampled Cartesian two-dimensional and three-dimensional (3)He lung ventilation images, and the k-spaces of 2D and 3D images were undersampled randomly and reconstructed by minimizing the L1 norm. The simulation results show that temporal resolution can be readily improved by a factor of 2 for two-dimensional and 4 to 5 for three-dimensional ventilation imaging with (3)He with the levels of signal to noise ratio (SNR) (approximately 19) typically obtained. The feasibility of producing accurate functional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from undersampled data acquired with fewer radiofrequency pulses was also demonstrated, with the preservation of quantitative information (mean ADC(cs) approximately mean ADC(full) approximately 0.16 cm(2) sec(-1)). Prospective acquisition of 2-fold undersampled two-dimensional (3)He images with a compressed sensing k-space pattern was then demonstrated in a healthy volunteer, and the results were compared to the equivalent fully sampled images (SNR(cs) = 34, SNR(full) = 19).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20373407     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  20 in total

1.  Phase-contrast MRI and CFD modeling of apparent ³He gas flow in rat pulmonary airways.

Authors:  Kevin R Minard; Andrew P Kuprat; Senthil Kabilan; Richard E Jacob; Daniel R Einstein; James P Carson; Richard A Corley
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Imaging for lung physiology: what do we wish we could measure?

Authors:  H Thomas Robertson; Richard B Buxton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-05-10

3.  Enhancement of the low resolution image quality using randomly sampled data for multi-slice MR imaging.

Authors:  Yong Pang; Baiying Yu; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-04

4.  Compressed sensing sodium MRI of cartilage at 7T: preliminary study.

Authors:  Guillaume Madelin; Gregory Chang; Ricardo Otazo; Alexej Jerschow; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Optically polarized 3He.

Authors:  T R Gentile; P J Nacher; B Saam; T G Walker
Journal:  Rev Mod Phys       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 54.494

6.  Rapid acquisition of helium-3 and proton three-dimensional image sets of the human lung in a single breath-hold using compressed sensing.

Authors:  Kun Qing; Talissa A Altes; Nicholas J Tustison; Xue Feng; Xiao Chen; Jaime F Mata; G Wilson Miller; Eduard E de Lange; William A Tobias; Gordon D Cates; James R Brookeman; John P Mugler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Compressed-sensing MRI with random encoding.

Authors:  Justin P Haldar; Diego Hernando; Zhi-Pei Liang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 8.  In vivo MRI cell tracking using perfluorocarbon probes and fluorine-19 detection.

Authors:  Eric T Ahrens; Jia Zhong
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Accelerated fluorine-19 MRI cell tracking using compressed sensing.

Authors:  Jia Zhong; Parker H Mills; T Kevin Hitchens; Eric T Ahrens
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Alice C Yang; Madison Kretzler; Sonja Sudarski; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.