Literature DB >> 20937579

Compressed-sensing MRI with random encoding.

Justin P Haldar1, Diego Hernando, Zhi-Pei Liang.   

Abstract

Compressed sensing (CS) has the potential to reduce magnetic resonance (MR) data acquisition time. In order for CS-based imaging schemes to be effective, the signal of interest should be sparse or compressible in a known representation, and the measurement scheme should have good mathematical properties with respect to this representation. While MR images are often compressible, the second requirement is often only weakly satisfied with respect to commonly used Fourier encoding schemes. This paper investigates the use of random encoding for CS-MRI, in an effort to emulate the "universal" encoding schemes suggested by the theoretical CS literature. This random encoding is achieved experimentally with tailored spatially-selective radio-frequency (RF) pulses. Both simulation and experimental studies were conducted to investigate the imaging properties of this new scheme with respect to Fourier schemes. Results indicate that random encoding has the potential to outperform conventional encoding in certain scenarios. However, our study also indicates that random encoding fails to satisfy theoretical sufficient conditions for stable and accurate CS reconstruction in many scenarios of interest. Therefore, there is still no general theoretical performance guarantee for CS-MRI, with or without random encoding, and CS-based methods should be developed and validated carefully in the context of specific applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20937579      PMCID: PMC3271122          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2085084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  20 in total

1.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via l minimization.

Authors:  David L Donoho; Michael Elad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Improved k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE using FOCUSS.

Authors:  Hong Jung; Jong Chul Ye; Eung Yeop Kim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Projection reconstruction MR imaging using FOCUSS.

Authors:  Jong Chul Ye; Sungho Tak; Yeji Han; Hyun Wook Park
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Accelerating SENSE using compressed sensing.

Authors:  Dong Liang; Bo Liu; Jiunjie Wang; Leslie Ying
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Variable density compressed image sampling.

Authors:  Zhongmin Wang; Gonzalo R Arce
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.856

7.  Optimization of k-space trajectories for compressed sensing by Bayesian experimental design.

Authors:  Matthias Seeger; Hannes Nickisch; Rolf Pohmann; Bernhard Schölkopf
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Multilevel wavelet-transform encoding in MRI.

Authors:  R D Peters; M L Wood
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Optimized phase scrambling for RF phase encoding.

Authors:  G Johnson; E X Wu; S K Hilal
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1994-01

10.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Emil Y Sidky; Michael Vannier
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.407

View more
  30 in total

1.  Self-supervised learning of physics-guided reconstruction neural networks without fully sampled reference data.

Authors:  Burhaneddin Yaman; Seyed Amir Hossein Hosseini; Steen Moeller; Jutta Ellermann; Kâmil Uğurbil; Mehmet Akçakaya
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Undersampling patterns in k-space for compressed sensing MRI using two-dimensional Cartesian sampling.

Authors:  Shinya Kojima; Hiroyuki Shinohara; Takeyuki Hashimoto; Shigeru Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-08-04

3.  Hepatic fat assessment using advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Yong Pang; Baiying Yu; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-09

4.  OEDIPUS: An Experiment Design Framework for Sparsity-Constrained MRI.

Authors:  Justin P Haldar; Daeun Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Enhancement of the low resolution image quality using randomly sampled data for multi-slice MR imaging.

Authors:  Yong Pang; Baiying Yu; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-04

6.  Sparsity and low-contrast object detectability.

Authors:  Joshua D Trzasko; Zhonghao Bao; Armando Manduca; Kiaran P McGee; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting review part 2: Technique and directions.

Authors:  Debra F McGivney; Rasim Boyacıoğlu; Yun Jiang; Megan E Poorman; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani; Kathryn E Keenan; Mark A Griswold; Dan Ma
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Compressive sensing in medical imaging.

Authors:  Christian G Graff; Emil Y Sidky
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 1.980

9.  Greedy Algorithms for Nonnegativity-Constrained Simultaneous Sparse Recovery.

Authors:  Daeun Kim; Justin P Haldar
Journal:  Signal Processing       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.662

10.  Accelerated High-Dimensional MR Imaging With Sparse Sampling Using Low-Rank Tensors.

Authors:  Jingfei He; Qiegen Liu; Anthony G Christodoulou; Chao Ma; Fan Lam; Zhi-Pei Liang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.