Literature DB >> 20370251

Design and validation of a general purpose robotic testing system for musculoskeletal applications.

Lawrence D Noble1, Robb W Colbrunn, Dong-Gil Lee, Antonie J van den Bogert, Brian L Davis.   

Abstract

Orthopaedic research on in vitro forces applied to bones, tendons, and ligaments during joint loading has been difficult to perform because of limitations with existing robotic simulators in applying full-physiological loading to the joint under investigation in real time. The objectives of the current work are as follows: (1) describe the design of a musculoskeletal simulator developed to support in vitro testing of cadaveric joint systems, (2) provide component and system-level validation results, and (3) demonstrate the simulator's usefulness for specific applications of the foot-ankle complex and knee. The musculoskeletal simulator allows researchers to simulate a variety of loading conditions on cadaver joints via motorized actuators that simulate muscle forces while simultaneously contacting the joint with an external load applied by a specialized robot. Multiple foot and knee studies have been completed at the Cleveland Clinic to demonstrate the simulator's capabilities. Using a variety of general-use components, experiments can be designed to test other musculoskeletal joints as well (e.g., hip, shoulder, facet joints of the spine). The accuracy of the tendon actuators to generate a target force profile during simulated walking was found to be highly variable and dependent on stance position. Repeatability (the ability of the system to generate the same tendon forces when the same experimental conditions are repeated) results showed that repeat forces were within the measurement accuracy of the system. It was determined that synchronization system accuracy was 6.7+/-2.0 ms and was based on timing measurements from the robot and tendon actuators. The positioning error of the robot ranged from 10 microm to 359 microm, depending on measurement condition (e.g., loaded or unloaded, quasistatic or dynamic motion, centralized movements or extremes of travel, maximum value, or root-mean-square, and x-, y- or z-axis motion). Algorithms and methods for controlling specimen interactions with the robot (with and without muscle forces) to duplicate physiological loading of the joints through iterative pseudo-fuzzy logic and real-time hybrid control are described. Results from the tests of the musculoskeletal simulator have demonstrated that the speed and accuracy of the components, the synchronization timing, the force and position control methods, and the system software can adequately replicate the biomechanics of human motion required to conduct meaningful cadaveric joint investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20370251     DOI: 10.1115/1.4000851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  9 in total

1.  In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Tyler W Knighton; Linda Amoafo; Klevis Aliaj; Christopher W Kolz; Yue Zhang; Tucker Hermans; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  A generalized framework for determination of functional musculoskeletal joint coordinate systems.

Authors:  Tara F Nagle; Ahmet Erdemir; Robb W Colbrunn
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Biomechanical Function and Size of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the ACL Change Differently with Skeletal Growth in the Pig Model.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Emily P Lambeth; Hongyu Ru; Lynn A Fordham; Jorge A Piedrahita; Jeffrey T Spang; Matthew B Fisher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  An elaborate data set characterizing the mechanical response of the foot.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Pavana A Sirimamilla; Jason P Halloran; Antonie J van den Bogert
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 5.  Recent advances in computational mechanics of the human knee joint.

Authors:  M Kazemi; Y Dabiri; L P Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  A Comprehensive Specimen-Specific Multiscale Data Set for Anatomical and Mechanical Characterization of the Tibiofemoral Joint.

Authors:  Snehal Chokhandre; Robb Colbrunn; Craig Bennetts; Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development of a Robotic Assembly for Analyzing the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation of the Foot Ankle Complex.

Authors:  Kelly N Salb; Daniel M Wido; Thomas E Stewart; Denis J DiAngelo
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Open Knee: Open Source Modeling and Simulation in Knee Biomechanics.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Replicating dynamic humerus motion using an industrial robot.

Authors:  Klevis Aliaj; Gentry M Feeney; Balakumar Sundaralingam; Tucker Hermans; K Bo Foreman; Kent N Bachus; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.