Literature DB >> 31373947

Biomechanical Function and Size of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the ACL Change Differently with Skeletal Growth in the Pig Model.

Stephanie G Cone1, Emily P Lambeth, Hongyu Ru, Lynn A Fordham, Jorge A Piedrahita, Jeffrey T Spang, Matthew B Fisher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ACL injuries are becoming increasingly common in children and adolescents, but little is known regarding age-specific ACL function in these patients. To improve our understanding of changes in musculoskeletal tissues during growth and given the limited availability of pediatric human cadaveric specimens, tissue structure and function can be assessed in large animal models, such as the pig. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using cadaveric porcine specimens ranging throughout skeletal growth, we aimed to assess age-dependent changes in (1) joint kinematics under applied AP loads and varus-valgus moments, (2) biomechanical function of the ACL under the same loads, (3) the relative biomechanical function of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL; and (4) size and orientation of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles.
METHODS: Stifle joints (analogous to the human knee) were collected from female Yorkshire crossbreed pigs at five ages ranging from early youth to late adolescence (1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, and 18 months; n = 6 pigs per age group, 30 total), and MRIs were performed. A robotic testing system was used to determine joint kinematics (AP tibial translation and varus-valgus rotation) and in situ forces in the ACL and its bundles in response to applied anterior tibial loads and varus-valgus moments. To see if morphological changes to the ACL compared with biomechanical changes, ACL and bundle cross-sectional area, length, and orientation were calculated from MR images.
RESULTS: Joint kinematics decreased with increasing age. Normalized AP tibial translation decreased by 44% from 1.5 months (0.34 ± 0.08) to 18 months (0.19 ± 0.02) at 60° of flexion (p < 0.001) and varus-valgus rotation decreased from 25° ± 2° at 1.5 months to 6° ± 2° at 18 months (p < 0.001). The ACL provided the majority of the resistance to anterior tibial loading at all age groups (75% to 111% of the applied anterior force; p = 0.630 between ages). Anteromedial and posterolateral bundle function in response to anterior loading and varus torque were similar in pigs of young ages. During adolescence (4.5 to 18 months), the in situ force carried by the anteromedial bundle increased relative to that carried by the posterolateral bundle, shifting from 59% ± 22% at 4.5 months to 92% ± 12% at 18 months (data for 60° of flexion, p < 0.001 between 4.5 and 18 months). The cross-sectional area of the anteromedial bundle increased by 30 mm throughout growth from 1.5 months (5 ± 2 mm) through 18 months (35 ± 8 mm; p < 0.001 between 1.5 and 18 months), while the cross-sectional area of the posterolateral bundle increased by 12 mm from 1.5 months (7 ± 2 mm) to 4.5 months (19 ± 5 mm; p = 0.004 between 1.5 and 4.5 months), with no further growth (17 ± 7 mm at 18 months; p = 0.999 between 4.5 and 18 months). However, changes in length and orientation were similar between the bundles.
CONCLUSION: We showed that the stifle joint (knee equivalent) in the pig has greater translational and rotational laxity in early youth (1.5 to 3 months) compared with adolescence (4.5 to 18 months), that the ACL functions as a primary stabilizer throughout growth, and that the relative biomechanical function and size of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles change differently with growth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given the large effects observed here, the age- and bundle-specific function, size, and orientation of the ACL may need to be considered regarding surgical timing, graft selection, and graft placement. In addition, the findings of this study will be used to motivate pre-clinical studies on the impact of partial and complete ACL injuries during skeletal growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31373947      PMCID: PMC7000103          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000884.

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  39 in total

1.  Evaluation of bone tunnel placement for suture augmentation of an injured anterior cruciate ligament: effects on joint stability in a goat model.

Authors:  Matthew B Fisher; Ho-Joong Jung; Patrick J McMahon; Savio L-Y Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Quantitative In Situ Analysis of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Length, Midsubstance Cross-sectional Area, and Insertion Site Areas.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Fujimaki; Eric Thorhauer; Yusuke Sasaki; Patrick Smolinski; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Anatomic, radiographic, biomechanical, and kinematic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and its two functional bundles.

Authors:  Anikar Chhabra; James S Starman; Mario Ferretti; Armando F Vidal; Thore Zantop; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Biomechanics of the porcine triple bundle anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Yuki Kato; Sheila J M Ingham; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Takashi Horaguchi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Effect of combined axial compressive and anterior tibial loads on in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament: a porcine study.

Authors:  G Li; T W Rudy; C Allen; M Sakane; S L Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads.

Authors:  M Sakane; R J Fox; S L Woo; G A Livesay; G Li; F H Fu
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Effect of knee flexion on the in situ force distribution in the human anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  J W Xerogeanes; Y Takeda; G A Livesay; Y Ishibashi; H S Kim; F H Fu; S L Woo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Biomechanical function of the human anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Y Takeda; J W Xerogeanes; G A Livesay; F H Fu; S L Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Sex-based differences in knee ligament biomechanics during robotically simulated athletic tasks.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Rebecca J Nesbitt; Jason T Shearn; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Abbey Kennedy; Dezba G Coughlin; Melodie F Metzger; Ronald Tang; Andrew D Pearle; Jeffrey C Lotz; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  5 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Biomechanical Function and Size of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the ACL Change Differently with Skeletal Growth in the Pig Model.

Authors:  Nicole A Wilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In Situ Joint Stiffness Increases During Skeletal Growth but Decreases Following Partial and Complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Jorge A Piedrahita; Jeffrey T Spang; Matthew Fisher
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Sex-specific biomechanics and morphology of the anterior cruciate ligament during skeletal growth in a porcine model.

Authors:  Danielle Howe; Stephanie G Cone; Jorge A Piedrahita; Bruce Collins; Lynn A Fordham; Emily H Griffith; Jeffrey T Spang; Matthew B Fisher
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.102

4.  Age- and sex-specific differences in ACL and ACL bundle size during adolescent growth.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Ryan H Barnes; Danielle Howe; Lynn A Fordham; Matthew B Fisher; Jeffrey T Spang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.102

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament remnant-preserving and re-tensioning reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison study of three different re-tensioning methods in a porcine model.

Authors:  Dong Jin Ryu; Kyeu Back Kwon; Da Hee Hong; Sang Jun Park; Jae Sung Park; Joon Ho Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.