Literature DB >> 16425298

Quantitative analysis of the GAL4/UAS system in Drosophila oogenesis.

Lea A Goentoro1, Nir Yakoby, Joseph Goodhouse, Trudi Schüpbach, Stanislav Y Shvartsman.   

Abstract

The GAL4/UAS system is extensively used for targeted gene expression in Drosophila, but the strength of the GAL4 drivers and their effects on target genes are rarely quantified. Quantitative information about the strength of the perturbations introduced by the GAL4/UAS system would further expand the usefulness of the GAL4/UAS system in studying gene functions and developmental processes. We have developed an assay to determine the relative level of expression for target genes tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP). Our assay enables the relative quantitation of fluorescent proteins within specific cell types and developmental time windows in living eggs/embryos, and permits the analysis of samples from a broad expression range. We illustrate the assay using a panel of four GAL4 drivers and three UAS responder lines in Drosophila oogenesis, discuss the issues associated with the interpretation of the quantitative data, and correlate our results with the analysis of the GAL4/UAS system at the transcript level. The imaging-based strategy described here can be used to quantify other GAL4 drivers in Drosophila and other organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16425298     DOI: 10.1002/gene.20184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genesis        ISSN: 1526-954X            Impact factor:   2.487


  22 in total

1.  Epigenetic stability increases extensively during Drosophila follicle stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Andrew D Skora; Allan C Spradling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantifying the Gurken morphogen gradient in Drosophila oogenesis.

Authors:  Lea A Goentoro; Gregory T Reeves; Craig P Kowal; Luigi Martinelli; Trudi Schüpbach; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Pattern formation by a moving morphogen source.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Zartman; Lily S Cheung; Matthew G Niepielko; Christine Bonini; Benjamin Haley; Nir Yakoby; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Pattern formation by dynamically interacting network motifs.

Authors:  Jessica Lembong; Nir Yakoby; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Distinct functional specificities are associated with protein isoforms encoded by the Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning gene pipe.

Authors:  Zhenyu Zhang; Xianjun Zhu; Leslie M Stevens; David Stein
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Shutoff of BZLF1 gene expression is necessary for immortalization of primary B cells by Epstein-Barr virus.

Authors:  Xianming Yu; Patrick J McCarthy; Zhenxun Wang; Daniel A Gorlen; Janet E Mertz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Control of non-apoptotic nurse cell death by engulfment genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Allison K Timmons; Albert A Mondragon; Tracy L Meehan; Kimberly McCall
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.160

8.  Polar cell fate stimulates Wolbachia intracellular growth.

Authors:  Ajit D Kamath; Mark A Deehan; Horacio M Frydman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 9.  Pattern formation by receptor tyrosine kinases: analysis of the Gurken gradient in Drosophila oogenesis.

Authors:  Lily S Cheung; Trudi Schüpbach; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  Image analysis and empirical modeling of gene and protein expression.

Authors:  Nathanie Trisnadi; Alphan Altinok; Angelike Stathopoulos; Gregory T Reeves
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.