Literature DB >> 2036189

Aerodynamic properties of the low-resistance Groningen button.

R J Zijlstra1, H F Mahieu, J T van Lith-Bijl, H K Schutte.   

Abstract

Shunt tracheoesophageal speech is currently the most successful form of voice and speech rehabilitation in laryngectomees. Insertion of valve prostheses into the tracheoesophageal shunts has overcome drawbacks caused by stenosis of the shunt and aspiration. In 10 years of satisfactory results with the standard Groningen button valve prosthesis, the overall concept of this device has proved its value. The airflow resistance, however, is relatively high, so that a low-resistance device has been developed without changing the favorable characteristics of the standard device. The design of this low-resistance Groningen button is described. The airflow resistances of the standard and low-resistance Groningen buttons have been measured and compared. The airflow resistance of the low-resistance Groningen button is also compared with the reported airflow resistances of various other valve prostheses.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2036189     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870180093018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  7 in total

1.  Staffieri tracheo-oesophageal prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy: an evaluation of characteristics.

Authors:  G Belforte; M Carello; C Miani; A Staffieri
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Clinical experience with the low-resistance Groningen button.

Authors:  J T van Lith-Bijl; H F Mahieu; P Patel; R J Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The Blom-Singer tracheostoma valve as a valuable addition in the rehabilitation of the laryngectomized patient.

Authors:  F J van den Hoogen; C Meeuwis; M J Oudes; P Janssen; J J Manni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis in relation to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness.

Authors:  A Veenstra; F J van den Hoogen; H K Schutte; H F Nijdam; J J Manni; G J Verkerke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis.

Authors:  F J Hilgers; M W Cornelissen; A J Balm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.

Authors:  Leonora Q Schwandt; Henri-Jacques Tjong-Ayong; Ranny van Weissenbruch; Henny C der Mei; Frans W J Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  In vitro and in vivo microbial adhesion and growth on argon plasma-treated silicone rubber voice prostheses.

Authors:  E P Everaert; B van de Belt-Gritter; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher; G J Verkerke; F Dijk; H F Mahieu; A Reitsma
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.