Literature DB >> 8286099

Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis.

F J Hilgers1, M W Cornelissen, A J Balm.   

Abstract

The use of various prostheses for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy has become widely accepted in recent years. Two different types of prostheses can be distinguished: non-indwelling devices, which can be removed and replaced by the patient, and indwelling voice prostheses, which have to be removed and replaced by a physician. In this report we describe the in vitro measurement of the airflow dynamics of the recently developed Provox low-resistance, indwelling voice prosthesis. Airflows used in these experiments varied from 0.05 to 0.4 ls-1. With increasing flows, the trans-device air pressure against airflow rates increased from 0.28 kPa to 1.36 kPa, while the mean airflow resistance decreased from 5.6 to 3.4 kPa l-1 s-1. From these data and by comparison with data for other prostheses, the Provox voice prosthesis shows favorable airflow characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8286099     DOI: 10.1007/BF00180379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

1.  Surgical and prosthesis-related complications using the Groningen button voice prosthesis.

Authors:  J J Manni; P Van den Broek
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1990-12

2.  Aerodynamic characteristics of Blom-Singer low-pressure voice prostheses.

Authors:  B E Smith
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1986-01

3.  Physical and aerodynamic features of the Bordeaux voice prosthesis.

Authors:  A B Jebria; C Henry; J Petit; M Gioux; F Devars; L Traissac
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Pharyngeal plexus neurectomy for alaryngeal speech rehabilitation.

Authors:  M I Singer; E D Blom; R C Hamaker
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Groningen prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy.

Authors:  A A Annyas; H F Nijdam; J R Escajadillo; H F Mahieu; H Leever
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1984-02

6.  Airway resistance of the voice button.

Authors:  B Weinberg
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1982-08

7.  Aerodynamic properties of four tracheoesophageal puncture prostheses.

Authors:  B Weinberg; J Moon
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1984-10

8.  Selective myotomy for voice restoration after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  M I Singer; E D Blom
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1981-11

9.  Prosthetic vocal rehabilitation following laryngectomy. The voice button.

Authors:  W R Panje
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Vocal rehabilitation of tracheoesophageal speech failures.

Authors:  R F Baugh; J S Lewin; S R Baker
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.147

View more
  9 in total

1.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Soon-Hyun Ahn; Hyun Jun Hong; Soon Young Kwon; Kee Hwan Kwon; Jong-Lyel Roh; Junsun Ryu; Jun Hee Park; Seung-Kuk Baek; Guk Haeng Lee; Sei Young Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Man Ki Chung; Young Hoon Joo; Yong Bae Ji; Jeong Hun Hah; Minsu Kwon; Young Min Park; Chang Myeon Song; Sung-Chan Shin; Chang Hwan Ryu; Doh Young Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jae Won Chang; Ha Min Jeong; Jae-Keun Cho; Wonjae Cha; Byung Joon Chun; Ik Joon Choi; Hyo Geun Choi; Kang Dae Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  Aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis in relation to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness.

Authors:  A Veenstra; F J van den Hoogen; H K Schutte; H F Nijdam; J J Manni; G J Verkerke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Tracheo-esophageal Puncture (TEP) for Voice Rehabilitation in Laryngectomised Patients Blom-singer® Vs Provox® Prosthesis : Our Experience.

Authors:  Wvbs Ramalingam; D Chikara; G Rajagopal; A R Mehta; S Sarkar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Microbial colonization of tracheoesophageal voice prostheses (Provox2) following total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Brigita Tićac; Robert Tićac; Tomislav Rukavina; Palmira Gregorović Kesovija; Dijana Pedisić; Boris Maljevac; Radan Starcević
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.

Authors:  Leonora Q Schwandt; Henri-Jacques Tjong-Ayong; Ranny van Weissenbruch; Henny C der Mei; Frans W J Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation: state of the art at the millennium.

Authors:  Dale H Brown; Frans J M Hilgers; Jonathan C Irish; Alfons J M Balm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The impact of radiotherapy and GERD on in situ lifetime of indwelling voice prostheses.

Authors:  Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Carlo Marchiori; Alessandro Gava; Maria Cristina Da Mosto
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Physiology and prospects of bimanual tracheoesophageal brass instrument play.

Authors:  F J M Hilgers; R Dirven; I Jacobi; M W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  The impact of vocal rehabilitation on quality of life and voice handicap in patients with total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Cristina Ţiple; Tudor Drugan; Florina Veronica Dinescu; Rodica Mureşan; Magdalena Chirilă; Marcel Cosgarea
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 1.852

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.