Literature DB >> 16421748

Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.

Leonora Q Schwandt1, Henri-Jacques Tjong-Ayong, Ranny van Weissenbruch, Henny C der Mei, Frans W J Albers.   

Abstract

Tracheoesophageal voice prostheses need to be replaced due to increased airflow resistance or retrograde leakage of fluid into the trachea as a consequence of biofilm formation. Previous in vitro studies show a change of aerodynamic features of biofilm covered voice prostheses after removal of the prostheses out of the patient. To assess these changes in an in situ situation, aerodynamic characteristics were measured within 45 patients at the beginning and at the end of the wearing process of the Provox 2 voice prosthesis. As a consequence, the influence of biofilm formation on aerodynamic characteristics can be evaluated. In the majority of cases, leakage through the prosthesis was the reason for replacement. No differences were found in the total flow, volume range and intratracheal pressure (ITP) of the voice prostheses measured. The airflow resistance of biofilm covered prostheses was significantly reduced compared to new clean prostheses. However, no correlation was found between the extent of biofilm and the different aerodynamic features measured. Biofilm formation on the Provox 2 is responsible for both reduction in airflow resistance and leakage through the prosthesis by deterioration of the silicone rubber material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16421748     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-005-0001-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  Acoustical analysis of Spanish vowels produced by laryngectomized subjects.

Authors:  T Cervera; J L Miralles; J González-Alvarez
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Aerodynamics of esophageal voice production with and without a Groningen voice prosthesis.

Authors:  H K Schutte; G J Nieboer
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.849

3.  Microbial colonization of the Groningen speaking valve and its relationship to valve failure.

Authors:  S R Ell; A J Mitchell; A J Parker
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1995-12

4.  In vivo measurements of indwelling tracheo-oesophageal prostheses in alaryngeal speech.

Authors:  J M Heaton; D Sanderson; I R Dunsmore; A J Parker
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1996-08

5.  In vitro comparison of the Groningen high resistance, Groningen low resistance and Provox speaking valves.

Authors:  J M Heaton; A J Parker
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.

Authors:  R P Chung; P Patel; M Ter Keurs; J T Van Lith Bijl; H F Mahieu
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1998

7.  Effect of dairy products on the lifetime of Provox2 voice prostheses in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Leonora Q Schwandt; Ranny van Weissenbruch; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher; Frans W J Albers
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single Institution's experience with consistent application of provox indwelling voice prostheses.

Authors:  B M Op de Coul; F J Hilgers; A J Balm; I B Tan; F J van den Hoogen; H van Tinteren
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-11

9.  Biodeterioration of medical-grade silicone rubber used for voice prostheses: a SEM study.

Authors:  T R Neu; H C Van der Mei; H J Busscher; F Dijk; G J Verkerke
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Microflora on explanted silicone rubber voice prostheses: taxonomy, hydrophobicity and electrophoretic mobility.

Authors:  T R Neu; G J Verkerke; I F Herrmann; H K Schutte; H C Van der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1994-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Novel modification of voice prosthesis.

Authors:  Basel Al Kadah; George Papaspyrou; Mathias Schneider; Bernhard Schick
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.