Emidio Tarulli1, A J Fox. 1. Neuroradiology Division, Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. e.tarulli@utoronto.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a high incidence of intracranial aneurysms of the AcomA suggesting the possibility of an anatomic risk factor. There also exists an association of termination-type aneurysms with anatomic variations of 1 anterior cerebral artery trunk (A1) as the exclusive or dominant supply to both pericallosal arteries (A2). This yields the hypotheses of aneurysm formation from straight jets of A1 blood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anatomy and contrast filling of A1 and A2 segments and AcomAs were studied for a subset of cases entered into the Cerecyte Coil Trial for patients with AcomA (n = 105) and other aneurysms (n = 123) that were selected from imaging available at the Cerecyte Core Trial angiographic Core Lab. These cases were analyzed for A1 vessel dominance by measurement of the vessel diameter and dilution of angiographic contrast agent in A2s due to the differential flow source on selective angiography. A control group without aneurysms was assessed anatomically, using a large sequential CTA series (n = 159), acquired during acute stroke assessment. RESULTS: A1 dominance configuration is strongly associated with the presence of AcomA aneurysms for patients with intracranial aneurysms (odds ratio, 17.8). This association is also present compared with the incidence of A1 dominance in the large sequential control series of patients without aneurysms undergoing CTA for other reasons (odds ratio, 7.5). Outflow dilution of selective angiographic images augments anatomic information. CONCLUSIONS: A flow-based assessment of contrast flowing from the A1 to the A2 segments after injection pressure is superior to an A1 diameter based categorization when A1 vessel diameters are not strikingly different. The anatomic variant of asymmetric A1 configurations likely facilitates the development of AcomA aneurysms by flow stresses, providing further evidence to support the role of biophysical factors in intracranial aneurysm development.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a high incidence of intracranial aneurysms of the AcomA suggesting the possibility of an anatomic risk factor. There also exists an association of termination-type aneurysms with anatomic variations of 1 anterior cerebral artery trunk (A1) as the exclusive or dominant supply to both pericallosal arteries (A2). This yields the hypotheses of aneurysm formation from straight jets of A1 blood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anatomy and contrast filling of A1 and A2 segments and AcomAs were studied for a subset of cases entered into the Cerecyte Coil Trial for patients with AcomA (n = 105) and other aneurysms (n = 123) that were selected from imaging available at the Cerecyte Core Trial angiographic Core Lab. These cases were analyzed for A1 vessel dominance by measurement of the vessel diameter and dilution of angiographic contrast agent in A2s due to the differential flow source on selective angiography. A control group without aneurysms was assessed anatomically, using a large sequential CTA series (n = 159), acquired during acute stroke assessment. RESULTS: A1 dominance configuration is strongly associated with the presence of AcomA aneurysms for patients with intracranial aneurysms (odds ratio, 17.8). This association is also present compared with the incidence of A1 dominance in the large sequential control series of patients without aneurysms undergoing CTA for other reasons (odds ratio, 7.5). Outflow dilution of selective angiographic images augments anatomic information. CONCLUSIONS: A flow-based assessment of contrast flowing from the A1 to the A2 segments after injection pressure is superior to an A1 diameter based categorization when A1 vessel diameters are not strikingly different. The anatomic variant of asymmetric A1 configurations likely facilitates the development of AcomA aneurysms by flow stresses, providing further evidence to support the role of biophysical factors in intracranial aneurysm development.
Authors: B K Velthuis; M S van Leeuwen; T D Witkamp; L M Ramos; J W Berkelbach van der Sprenkel; G J Rinkel Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: David O Wiebers; J P Whisnant; J Huston; I Meissner; R D Brown; D G Piepgras; G S Forbes; K Thielen; D Nichols; W M O'Fallon; J Peacock; L Jaeger; N F Kassell; G L Kongable-Beckman; J C Torner Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-07-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: E Siebert; G Bohner; M Dewey; F Masuhr; K T Hoffmann; J Mews; F Engelken; H C Bauknecht; S Diekmann; R Klingebiel Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: A J Fox; J Millar; J Raymond; J C Pryor; D Roy; G A Tomlinson; J P McKay; A J Molyneux Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jian Zhang; Anil Can; Pui Man Rosalind Lai; Srinivasan Mukundan; Victor M Castro; Dmitriy Dligach; Sean Finan; Vivian S Gainer; Nancy A Shadick; Guergana Savova; Shawn N Murphy; Tianxi Cai; Scott T Weiss; Rose Du Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 2.104