Literature DB >> 19039047

Dangerous advances in measurements from digital subtraction angiography: when is a millimeter not a millimeter?

A J Fox1, J Millar, J Raymond, J C Pryor, D Roy, G A Tomlinson, J P McKay, A J Molyneux.   

Abstract

Aneurysms need accurate millimeters (mm). Direct millimeters were lost with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) years ago, with measurements in pixels. Advances in DSA can now give inherent millimeters. The Cerecyte aneurysm coiling trial's angiographic core lab assesses images from compact disc (CD). External fiducials for millimeter calibration are required. Of 25 cases with two 10 mm fiducials, near and far from the intensifier, the midline mean is between 9 "mm" to 15 "mm". Yet 10 mm must be 10 mm. This variance is potentially dangerous. Proprietary software seems to prohibit calibration transfer via CD to another vendor's system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19039047     DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Seung Chai Jung; Sang Hun Lee; Ji Young Jeon; Ji Ye Lee; Ho Sung Kim; Choong-Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Seon-Ok Kim; Sun U Kwon; Dong-Wha Kang; Jong S Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Potent risk factor for aneurysm formation: termination aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery and detection of A1 vessel asymmetry by flow dilution.

Authors:  Emidio Tarulli; A J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Effects on vessel measurement accuracy and subsequent occlusion after calcium channel blocker infusion during treatment of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  M D Alexander; A D Nicholson; R J Darflinger; F Settecase; D L Cooke; C F Dowd; M R Amans; R T Higashida; S W Hetts; V V Halbach
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Comparative analysis of aneurysm volume by different methods based on angiography and computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Víctor Hugo Escobar-de la Garma; Marco Zenteno; Felipe Padilla-Vázquez; Daniel San-Juan; Aurelio Cerón-Morales
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Comparison of remnant size in embolized intracranial aneurysms measured at follow-up with DSA and MRA.

Authors:  Zbigniew Serafin; Piotr Strześniewski; Władysław Lasek; Wojciech Beuth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.804

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.