BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atherosclerotic disease of the carotid artery is an important cause of ischemic stroke. We evaluated carotid plaque morphologic features by using CTA in addition to stenosis in the setting of symptomatic hemispheric TIA/stroke to identify factors that may predict plaque activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred seventy-three patients (408 men; ages, 18-91 years; mean, 65.8 +/- 15.2 years) presenting with hemispheric ischemic symptoms and having a CTA that included imaging of both carotid arteries within 24 hours were studied. Scans were interpreted for morphologic features, such as plaque length and width, attenuation, shape, surface, presence and degree of calcification, and ILT in addition to stenosis. RESULTS: Univariable analysis showed that carotid occlusions (P = .01, OR = 5.27), high-grade stenosis (70%-99%) (P = .06, OR = 1.8), and the presence of ILT (P = .01, OR = 4.33) were highly predictive of the symptomatic side. Smooth plaque (P = .01, OR = 0.73) and extensive calcification (P = .03, OR = 0.72) were more commonly associated with the asymptomatic side. There was no correlation between plaque hypoattenuation (P = .7, OR = 1.06) or ulcerated plaque (P = .74, OR = 0.955) in predicting the symptomatic side. In a multivariable logistic regression model, the presence of ILT was still found to be significantly associated with the symptomatic side (P = .048, OR = 3.1) and the presence of extensive calcification, with the asymptomatic carotid artery (P = .047, OR = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to higher stenosis grades, the presence of ILT is highly predictive of the symptomatic side in carotid disease. Smooth plaque and extensive calcification seem to afford a protective effect. This information may be useful in radiologic risk stratification in carotid disease in addition to the current evidence available based on stenosis criteria alone.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Atherosclerotic disease of the carotid artery is an important cause of ischemic stroke. We evaluated carotid plaque morphologic features by using CTA in addition to stenosis in the setting of symptomatic hemispheric TIA/stroke to identify factors that may predict plaque activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred seventy-three patients (408 men; ages, 18-91 years; mean, 65.8 +/- 15.2 years) presenting with hemispheric ischemic symptoms and having a CTA that included imaging of both carotid arteries within 24 hours were studied. Scans were interpreted for morphologic features, such as plaque length and width, attenuation, shape, surface, presence and degree of calcification, and ILT in addition to stenosis. RESULTS: Univariable analysis showed that carotid occlusions (P = .01, OR = 5.27), high-grade stenosis (70%-99%) (P = .06, OR = 1.8), and the presence of ILT (P = .01, OR = 4.33) were highly predictive of the symptomatic side. Smooth plaque (P = .01, OR = 0.73) and extensive calcification (P = .03, OR = 0.72) were more commonly associated with the asymptomatic side. There was no correlation between plaque hypoattenuation (P = .7, OR = 1.06) or ulcerated plaque (P = .74, OR = 0.955) in predicting the symptomatic side. In a multivariable logistic regression model, the presence of ILT was still found to be significantly associated with the symptomatic side (P = .048, OR = 3.1) and the presence of extensive calcification, with the asymptomatic carotid artery (P = .047, OR = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to higher stenosis grades, the presence of ILT is highly predictive of the symptomatic side in carotid disease. Smooth plaque and extensive calcification seem to afford a protective effect. This information may be useful in radiologic risk stratification in carotid disease in addition to the current evidence available based on stenosis criteria alone.
Authors: Chun Yuan; Shao-xiong Zhang; Nayak L Polissar; Denise Echelard; Geraldo Ortiz; Joseph W Davis; Elizabeth Ellington; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N Yamada; M Higashi; R Otsubo; T Sakuma; N Oyama; R Tanaka; K Iihara; H Naritomi; K Minematsu; H Naito Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Nayak L Polissar; Gail P Jarvik; Carol Isaac; Judith McDonough; Cynthia Natiello; Randy Small; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-05-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M R Mayberg; S E Wilson; F Yatsu; D G Weiss; L Messina; L A Hershey; C Colling; J Eskridge; D Deykin; H R Winn Journal: JAMA Date: 1991-12-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: H A Marquering; C B L M Majoie; L Smagge; A G Kurvers; H A Gratama van Andel; R van den Berg; P J Nederkoorn Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L Saba; G Lanzino; P Lucatelli; F Lavra; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; J S Suri; C Yuan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E Choi; E Byun; S U Kwon; N Kim; C H Suh; H Kwon; Y Han; T-W Kwon; Y-P Cho Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H Baradaran; K Al-Dasuqi; A Knight-Greenfield; A Giambrone; D Delgado; E J Ebani; H Kamel; A Gupta Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Shahmir Kamalian; Shervin Kamalian; Stuart R Pomerantz; Teerath P Tanpitukpongse; Rajiv Gupta; Javier M Romero; Douglas S Katz Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2013-03-22
Authors: N Singh; J Ospel; A Mayank; M Marko; O O Zaidat; N H Mueller-Kronast; D S Liebeskind; M Goyal Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.966