PURPOSE: We describe the clinical and pathological outcomes of intraoperative frozen sections performed on the posterolateral prostate margins during nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a technique of bilateral nerve sparing, inking the posterolateral prostate margins and obtaining frozen sections. When tumor was seen on frozen section, the fascia and neurovascular bundle were widely excised before completing the vesicourethral anastomosis. We reviewed 142 radical retropubic prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon between 1992 and 1997. Patients were divided into group 1--nerve sparing procedure using our technique (48 patients), 2--planned unilateral nerve sparing without frozen sections (46) and 3--planned bilateral nerve sparing without frozen sections (48). Potency was measured implicitly by physician assessment and explicitly with the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index. Group comparisons were made for positive margins, biochemical recurrence and potency. Mean followup was 24.5, 43.8 and 39.4 months for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 48 group 1 patients 9 (18%) had adenocarcinoma in the frozen section specimen, prompting wide excision of the bundles. None of these patients had biochemical recurrence during a mean followup of 20.5 months. Both bundles were spared in the remaining 39 patients (82%). There was no difference in survival or time to biochemical recurrence between groups 1 and 2. Potency was significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (36 versus 13%, p = 0.001), even after age adjustment (p = 0.05). In contrast, potency did not differ between groups 1 and 3 (38 versus 40%). Preoperative stage, grade and prostate specific antigen level were similar among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant difference in potency rates adjusted for age between patients with and without frozen sections. Our results indicate that this technique can enhance the ability of the surgeon to monitor the nerve sparing procedure without compromising cancer control.
PURPOSE: We describe the clinical and pathological outcomes of intraoperative frozen sections performed on the posterolateral prostate margins during nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a technique of bilateral nerve sparing, inking the posterolateral prostate margins and obtaining frozen sections. When tumor was seen on frozen section, the fascia and neurovascular bundle were widely excised before completing the vesicourethral anastomosis. We reviewed 142 radical retropubic prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon between 1992 and 1997. Patients were divided into group 1--nerve sparing procedure using our technique (48 patients), 2--planned unilateral nerve sparing without frozen sections (46) and 3--planned bilateral nerve sparing without frozen sections (48). Potency was measured implicitly by physician assessment and explicitly with the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index. Group comparisons were made for positive margins, biochemical recurrence and potency. Mean followup was 24.5, 43.8 and 39.4 months for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 48 group 1 patients 9 (18%) had adenocarcinoma in the frozen section specimen, prompting wide excision of the bundles. None of these patients had biochemical recurrence during a mean followup of 20.5 months. Both bundles were spared in the remaining 39 patients (82%). There was no difference in survival or time to biochemical recurrence between groups 1 and 2. Potency was significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (36 versus 13%, p = 0.001), even after age adjustment (p = 0.05). In contrast, potency did not differ between groups 1 and 3 (38 versus 40%). Preoperative stage, grade and prostate specific antigen level were similar among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant difference in potency rates adjusted for age between patients with and without frozen sections. Our results indicate that this technique can enhance the ability of the surgeon to monitor the nerve sparing procedure without compromising cancer control.
Authors: Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Robert Rabenalt; Sunjay Jain; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos; Roman Ganzer; Lars-Christian Horn; Martin Burchardt; Fernando Jiménez-Cruz; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg Journal: World J Urol Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Andreas Becker; Carolina Coelius; Meike Adam; Pierre Tennstedt; Luis Kluth; Thomas Steuber; Hans Heinzer; Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm; Uwe Michl Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Elmar Heinrich; Georg Schön; Frank Schiefelbein; Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan Journal: World J Urol Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 4.226