Literature DB >> 20354859

Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome.

Saime Ay1, Sebnem Koldaş Doğan, Deniz Evcik, Ozgün Cakmak Başer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of phonophoresis, ultrasound and placebo ultrasound therapies in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). This is a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study. Sixty patients (48 women, 12 men, mean age 37.9 ± 12.2 years) with MPS were included in this study. Patients were allocated into three groups. Group 1(n = 20) was received diclofenac phonophoresis, group 2(n = 20) was received ultrasound and group 3(n = 20) was received placebo ultrasound therapies over trigger points, 10 min a day for 15 session during 3 weeks (1 MHz-1,5 watt/cm²). Additionally, all patients were given neck exercise program including isotonic, isometric and stretching. Patients were assessed by means of pain, range of motion (ROM) of neck, number of trigger points (NTP), algometric measurement and disability. Pain severity was measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and Likert scale. The neck pain disability index (NPDI) was used for assessing disability. Measurements were taken before and after treatment. After treatment, there were statistically significant improvements in pain severity, NTP, pressure pain threshold (PPT), ROM and NPDI scores both in phonophoresis and in ultrasound therapy groups (P < 0.05). Statistically significant increase in cervical lateral flexion and rotation was observed in the placebo US group. While there was no statistically significant improvement in the cervical flexion-extension joint movement, pain levels, number of trigger points and NPDI score, pressure pain threshold (P > 0.05), also there were no significant differences in all parameters between group 1 and 2 (P = 0.05). Both diclofenac phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy were effective in the treatment of patients with MPS. Phonophoresis was not found to be superior over ultrasound therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354859     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-010-1419-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  17 in total

Review 1.  Phonophoresis: efficiency, mechanisms and skin tolerance.

Authors:  L Machet; A Boucaud
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2002-08-28       Impact factor: 5.875

2.  Treatment of myofascial trigger-points with ultrasound combined with massage and exercise--a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Arne N Gam; Susan Warming; Lone Hørdum Larsen; Bente Jensen; Ola Høydalsmo; Ingelise Allon; Bente Andersen; Niels E Gøtzsche; Marelis Petersen; Birgitte Mathiesen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Phonophoresis versus ultrasound in the treatment of common musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  M D Klaiman; J A Shrader; J V Danoff; J E Hicks; W J Pesce; J Ferland
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Effect of indomethacin phonophoresis on the relief of temporomandibular joint pain.

Authors:  S M Shin; J K Choi
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.020

5.  Treatment of myofascial pain.

Authors:  M Esenyel; N Caglar; T Aldemir
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  Effects of ultrasound and diclofenac phonophoresis on inflammatory pain relief: suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in arthritic rats.

Authors:  Yueh-Ling Hsieh
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-01

Review 7.  Myofascial pain syndromes: where are we? Where are we going?

Authors:  D G Simons
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale.

Authors:  Ali Bicer; Aylin Yazici; Handan Camdeviren; Canan Erdogan
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Randomized controlled study of the antinociceptive effect of ultrasound on trigger point sensitivity: novel applications in myofascial therapy?

Authors:  John Z Srbely; James P Dickey
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.477

10.  Short term efficacy of ibuprofen phonophoresis versus continuous ultrasound therapy in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Erkan Kozanoglu; Sibel Basaran; Rengin Guzel; Fusun Guler-Uysal
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 2.193

View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Corticosteroid, and Physical Therapy in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Tuğçe Pasin; Safinaz Ataoğlu; Özge Pasin; Handan Ankarali
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 1.472

Review 2.  A Review of Laser Therapy and Low-Intensity Ultrasound for Chronic Pain States.

Authors:  Frank R Chen; Joseph E Manzi; Neel Mehta; Amitabh Gulati; Mark Jones
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-02-08

3.  Is phonophoresis effective in the treatment of chronic low back pain? A single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dilek Durmus; Gamze Alayli; Ahmet Salim Goktepe; Mehmet Ali Taskaynatan; Ayhan Bilgici; Omer Kuru
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Efficacy of EMLA cream phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of the trapezius: a single-blind, randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Nilgun Ustun; Fatma Arslan; Ayhan Mansuroglu; Deniz Inanoglu; Abdullah Erman Yagız; Hayal Guler; Ayse Dicle Turhanoglu
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of phonophoresis for the treatment of chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Dilek Durmus; Gamze Alayli; Tugce Tufekci; Omer Kuru
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  High-Energy Flux Density Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Traditional Physical Therapy Modalities in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized-controlled, Single-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Ömer Gezgİnaslan; Sevgi GÜmÜŞ Atalay
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 1.472

Review 7.  Trends in management of myofacial pain.

Authors:  Uma Shanker Pal; Lakshya Kumar; Gagan Mehta; Nimisha Singh; Geeta Singh; Mayank Singh; Hemant Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

8.  Myofascial pain syndrome: a treatment review.

Authors:  Mehul J Desai; Vikramjeet Saini; Shawnjeet Saini
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2013-02-12

9.  Effects of Temperature on Chronic Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome during Dry Needling Therapy.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Qian Gao; Jingshan Hou; Jun Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Parisa Taheri; Marzie Naderi; Saeid Khosravi
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.