Literature DB >> 16386061

Effects of ultrasound and diclofenac phonophoresis on inflammatory pain relief: suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in arthritic rats.

Yueh-Ling Hsieh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The direct effects of ultrasound (US) and phonophoresis of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) on injured peripheral tissue have been widely investigated, but evidence concerning the effects of central spinal nociceptive modulation seems to be lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the peripheral influences of US and phonophoresis on the modulation of spinal inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression elicited by hind paw stimulation with an ankle injection of complete Freund adjuvant (CFA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Inflammatory arthritis was induced in 18 male Wistar rats with intra-articular tibiotarsal injections of CFA. Serial changes in inflammatory pain reactions, including hind-limb edema, and the locomotor activity of the arthritic animals were measured. Arthritic rats underwent US (n=6), diclofenac phonophoresis (n=6), or sham treatment (n=6) on the CFA-injected leg at 18 hours after injection. At 20 hours after injection, spinal inducible nitric oxide synthase-like immunoreactive (iNOS-LI) cells were examined.
RESULTS: Following the CFA injection, all animals' paw diameters and ankle circumferences ipsilateral to the injected leg were significantly increased compared with the values prior to injection. The rearing behavior of arthritic animals had improved significantly after US and diclofenac phonophoresis treatments. The mean total number (+/-SD) of iNOS-LI cells per section of segments L1 and L2 of the bilateral spinal cord of the sham treatment, US, and phonophoresis groups were 531.20+/-6.11, 124.20+/-4.09, and 114.80+/-3.23, respectively. The total numbers of iNOS-LI cells in rats treated with US and diclofenac phonophoresis were significantly smaller than in those receiving sham treatment. There were no significant differences in the total number of iNOS-LI cells ipsilateral to the injected leg between the US and diclofenac phonophoresis groups. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound and phonophoresis treatments probably modulate and prevent the CFA-insult-induced increase in total and regional iNOS-LI neurons. Peripheral use of diclofenac phonophoresis offers little advantage over US alone in affecting the central mechanisms of nociception. The peripheral influences of US and phonophoresis on the central modulation of the spinal nociceptive processing system are important and may reflect the work being done through the neuroplasticity of spinal cord in response to peripheral input of US and phonophoresis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16386061     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/86.1.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  12 in total

1.  Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome.

Authors:  Saime Ay; Sebnem Koldaş Doğan; Deniz Evcik; Ozgün Cakmak Başer
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  The efficacy of phonophoresis on electrophysiological studies of the patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Feray Soyupek; Suleyman Kutluhan; Gokcen Uslusoy; Erdem Ilgun; Sevilay Eris; Ayhan Askin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends.

Authors:  Baris E Polat; Douglas Hart; Robert Langer; Daniel Blankschtein
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Inflammatory cytokines content in Achilles tendinopathy after phonophoresis treatment combined with gold nanoparticles and diclophenac diethylammonium in rats.

Authors:  Marcelo B Dohnert; Gabriela K Ferreira; Paulo Cesar Lock Silveira; Elton Torres Zanoni; Luciana H Dohnert; Cláudio Teodoro de Souza; Marcos M S Paula
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 5.  Physical energy for drug delivery; poration, concentration and activation.

Authors:  Shanmugamurthy Lakshmanan; Gaurav K Gupta; Pinar Avci; Rakkiyappan Chandran; Magesh Sadasivam; Ana Elisa Serafim Jorge; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on l929 fibroblasts.

Authors:  Rodrigo Franco de Oliveira; Deise A A Pires Oliveira; Cristina Pacheco Soares
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Effects of pulsed therapeutic ultrasound on the treatment of people with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande; Jose-Luis Osma-Rueda; Yannely Serrano-Villar; Carolina Ramírez
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-09-15

Review 8.  Perspectives on transdermal ultrasound mediated drug delivery.

Authors:  Nadine Barrie Smith
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007

Review 9.  Ultrasound-based Techniques as Alternative Treatments for Chronic Wounds: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Saad Ahmed Alkahtani; Pramod S Kunwar; Mostafa Jalilifar; Samaneh Rashidi; Ali Yadollahpour
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-12-15

10.  Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study.

Authors:  Semra Aktürk; Arzu Kaya; Derya Çetintaş; Gürkan Akgöl; Arif Gülkesen; Gül Ayden Kal; Tülin Güçer
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.