Literature DB >> 24149990

Efficacy of EMLA cream phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of the trapezius: a single-blind, randomized clinical study.

Nilgun Ustun1, Fatma Arslan, Ayhan Mansuroglu, Deniz Inanoglu, Abdullah Erman Yagız, Hayal Guler, Ayse Dicle Turhanoglu.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate whether eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream phonophoresis superior to conventional US over the trigger points (TPs) in terms of improvements of pain, range of motion and disability in myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Fifty patients (42 female, 8 male) diagnosed with MPS were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two treatment groups including phonophoresis (PH) group (n = 25) and ultrasound (US) group (n = 25). PH group received EMLA cream phonophoresis (2.5 % lidocaine, 2.5 % prilocaine); US group received conventional ultrasound therapy over the all active TPs on trapezius muscle for 10 min a day for 15 sessions. Outcome measures were performed before the treatment course and at the end of a 15-session course of treatment. Student T, Mann-Whitney U, chi-square and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. At the end of the therapy, there was statistically significant decrease in both PH group and US group in terms of number of trigger point (NTP) (p = 0.001, p = 0.029), pain intensity on movement (p = 0.001 vs. 0.002) and right/left cervical lateral ROMs (p = 0.001/p = 0.001, p = 0.009/p = 0.020) relative to baseline. The NTP decrease in PH group was significantly higher than that in US group (1.84 ± 1.46 vs. 0.72 ± 1.45; p = 0.01). Pain intensity at rest (p = 0.001) and NPDI scores (p = 0.001) were statistically improvement in only PH group. EMLA cream phonophoresis is more effective than conventional ultrasound therapy in terms of pain and associated neck disability, and it seems the complementary treatment option for MPS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24149990     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-013-2881-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  22 in total

Review 1.  Safety and tolerability of the lidocaine patch 5%, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Arnold R Gammaitoni; Nancy A Alvarez; Bradley S Galer
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 2.  Treatment of myofascial pain syndrome.

Authors:  Chang-Zern Hong
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2006-10

3.  Treatment of myofascial trigger-points with ultrasound combined with massage and exercise--a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Arne N Gam; Susan Warming; Lone Hørdum Larsen; Bente Jensen; Ola Høydalsmo; Ingelise Allon; Bente Andersen; Niels E Gøtzsche; Marelis Petersen; Birgitte Mathiesen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  New analgesics for neuropathic pain: the lidocaine patch.

Authors:  C E Argoff
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 5.  Fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes and the workers' compensation environment: an update.

Authors:  Radford J Hayden; Dean S Louis; Christopher Doro
Journal:  Clin Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006

6.  Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome.

Authors:  Saime Ay; Sebnem Koldaş Doğan; Deniz Evcik; Ozgün Cakmak Başer
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Analgesic effect of lidocaine patch 5% in the treatment of acute herpes zoster: a double-blind and vehicle-controlled study.

Authors:  Pei-Lin Lin; Shou-Zen Fan; Chi-Hsiang Huang; Hui-Hsun Huang; Ming-Cheng Tsai; Chen-Jung Lin; Wei-Zen Sun
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 8.  Myofascial pain syndromes: where are we? Where are we going?

Authors:  D G Simons
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response.

Authors:  C Z Hong
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale.

Authors:  Ali Bicer; Aylin Yazici; Handan Camdeviren; Canan Erdogan
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.033

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparative short-term effectiveness of ibuprofen gel and cream phonophoresis in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ilke Coskun Benlidayi; Neslihan Gokcen; Sibel Basaran
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Therapeutic effects of dry needling in patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points.

Authors:  Maryam Abbaszadeh-Amirdehi; Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari; Soofia Naghdi; Gholamreza Olyaei; Mohammad Reza Nourbakhsh
Journal:  Acupunct Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Parisa Taheri; Marzie Naderi; Saeid Khosravi
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-05-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.