Literature DB >> 18278532

Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study.

Joe J Tjandra1, Miranda K Y Chan, Chung Hung Yeh, Carolyn Murray-Green.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized study was designed to compare the effect of sacral neuromodulation with optimal medical therapy in patients with severe fecal incontinence.
METHODS: Patients (aged 39-86 years) with severe fecal incontinence were randomized to have sacral nerve stimulation (SNS group; n = 60) or best supportive therapy (control; n = 60), which consisted of pelvic floor exercises, bulking agent, and dietary manipulation. Full assessment included endoanal ultrasound, anorectal physiology, two-week bowel diary, and fecal incontinence quality of life index. The follow-up duration was 12 months.
RESULTS: The sacral nerve stimulation group was similar to the control group with regard to gender (F:M = 11:1 vs. 14:1) and age (mean, 63.9 vs. 63 years). The incidence of a defect of < or = 120 degrees of the external anal sphincter and pudendal neuropathy was similar between the groups. Trial screening improved incontinent episodes by more than 50 percent in 54 patients (90 percent). Full-stage sacral nerve stimulation was performed in 53 of these 54 "successful" patients. There were no septic complications. With sacral nerve stimulation, mean incontinent episodes per week decreased from 9.5 to 3.1 (P < 0.0001) and mean incontinent days per week from 3.3 to 1 (P < 0.0001). Perfect continence was accomplished in 25 patients (47.2 percent). In the sacral nerve stimulation group, there was a significant (P < 0.0001) improvement in fecal incontinence quality of life index in all four domains. By contrast, there was no significant improvement in fecal continence and the fecal incontinence quality of life scores in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacral neuromodulation significantly improved the outcome in patients with severe fecal incontinence compared with the control group undergoing optimal medical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18278532     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9103-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  57 in total

1.  Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Emile Tan; Nye-Thane Ngo; Ara Darzi; Michael Shenouda; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with severe fecal incontinence after rectal resection.

Authors:  P Moya; A Arroyo; L Soriano-Irigaray; A Frangi; F Candela Polo; R Calpena Rico
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Sacral nerve modulation in overactive bladder.

Authors:  John A Occhino; Steven W Siegel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence in a patient with organophosphate poisoning.

Authors:  M Tayyab; R Arsalani-Zadeh; S Ullah; S Mehmood; P Waudby; G S Duthie
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Diagnosis and treatment of pelvic floor disorders: what's new and what to do.

Authors:  William E Whitehead; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Sacral neuromodulation stimulation in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Tracy L Hull
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: an effective surgical intervention.

Authors:  Giuseppe Chiarioni; Olafur S Palsson; Corrado R Asteria; William E Whitehead
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Infection rates in a large investigational trial of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; Tracy Hull; Yair Edden; John A Coller; Ghislain Devroede; Richard McCallum; Miranda Chan; Jennifer M Ayscue; Abbas S Shobeiri; David Margolin; Michael England; Howard Kaufman; William J Snape; Ece Mutlu; Heidi Chua; Paul Pettit; Deborah Nagle; Robert D Madoff; Darin R Lerew; Anders Mellgren
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  [Sacral nerve modulation in coloproctology].

Authors:  M Gelos; M Niedergethmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Sacral nerve stimulation induces changes in the pelvic floor and rectum that improve continence and quality of life.

Authors:  Susanne Dorothea Otto; Stefanie Burmeister; Heinz J Buhr; Anton Kroesen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.