Literature DB >> 20352366

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among medical patients at US hospitals.

Michael B Rothberg1, Maureen Lahti, Penelope S Pekow, Peter K Lindenauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemoprophylaxis is recommended for medical patients at moderate to high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is now a requirement of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. To see who receives prophylaxis and how far hospitals will need to go to meet this requirement, we examined VTE prophylaxis patterns at US hospitals.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with seven medical diagnoses considered to carry moderate to high risk of VTE at 376 acute care facilities in 2004-2005. We excluded patients on warfarin or with hospital stays of <2 days. VTE prophylaxis was assessed by billing codes for any heparin or compression device. We classified patient risk using a VTE risk prediction model.
RESULTS: Of 351,535 patients included, 36% received prophylaxis by hospital day 2. Prophylaxis rates were highest among patients with certain VTE risk factors, including mechanical ventilation (67%), restraints (57%), central lines (55%), obesity (46%), and prior VTE (44%). The median hospital rate was 31% (IQR 19% to 42%); only 3% of hospitals had rates >70%. Compared to patients at low risk of VTE (<0.05%), patients at high risk (>1.0%) were more likely to receive prophylaxis (52% vs. 34%, p < 0.001). Hospitals with high rates of prescribing for high-risk patients also had high rates for low-risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS: VTE prophylaxis rates at US hospitals are substantially below Joint Commission targets, even for patients at highest risk of VTE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20352366      PMCID: PMC2869415          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1296-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  14 in total

1.  Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  J F Bergmann; J M Segrestaa; C Caulin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-07

2.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: adherence to the 1995 American College of Chest Physicians consensus guidelines for surgical patients.

Authors:  M A Stratton; F A Anderson; H I Bussey; J Caprini; A Comerota; S T Haines; D W Hawkins; M B O'Connell; R C Smith; K A Stringer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-02-14

4.  Thrombosis prophylaxis in hospitalised medical patients: does prophylaxis in all patients make sense?

Authors:  B Schuurman; M den Heijer; A M Nijs
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.422

5.  New onset of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients at Brigham and Women's Hospital is caused more often by prophylaxis failure than by withholding treatment.

Authors:  S Z Goldhaber; K Dunn; R C MacDougall
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group.

Authors:  M M Samama; A T Cohen; J Y Darmon; L Desjardins; A Eldor; C Janbon; A Leizorovicz; H Nguyen; C G Olsson; A G Turpie; N Weisslinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-09-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Victor F Tapson; Hervé Decousus; Mario Pini; Beng H Chong; James B Froehlich; Manuel Monreal; Alex C Spyropoulos; Geno J Merli; Rainer B Zotz; Jean-François Bergmann; Ricardo Pavanello; Alexander G G Turpie; Mashio Nakamura; Franco Piovella; Ajay K Kakkar; Frederick A Spencer; Gordon Fitzgerald; Frederick A Anderson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Utilization of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  M G Keane; E P Ingenito; S Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lironne Wein; Sara Wein; Steven Joseph Haas; James Shaw; Henry Krum
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-23

10.  Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alexander T Cohen; Victor F Tapson; Jean-Francois Bergmann; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Ajay K Kakkar; Bruno Deslandes; Wei Huang; Maksim Zayaruzny; Leigh Emery; Frederick A Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  14 in total

1.  Aggregating and disaggregating patients in clinical trials and their subgroup analyses.

Authors:  David M Kent; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Changing practice: implementation of a venous thromboembolism prophylaxis protocol at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Reda M Jaber; Justin M Zumsteg; Vlad Golgotiu; Lisa M Spratke; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization During an Acute Cardiac Hospitalization: A NATIONAL SAMPLE.

Authors:  Quinn R Pack; Aruna Priya; Tara Lagu; Penelope S Pekow; Robert Berry; Auras R Atreya; Philip A Ades; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 4.  Standard or extended-duration prophylaxis in medical patients? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  J E Stark; W J Smith
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  The appropriateness of enoxaparin use in Lebanese hospitals: a quality evaluation study.

Authors:  A A Zeitoun; J G Nassif; M M Zeineddine
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-09-10

6.  A decision model to estimate a risk threshold for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  P Le; K A Martinez; M A Pappas; M B Rothberg
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Prevalence, treatment, and outcomes associated with OSA among patients hospitalized with pneumonia.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; Mihaela S Stefan; Karin G Johnson; Aruna Priya; Penelope S Pekow; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Using Clinical Vignettes to Evaluate VTE Protocol Adherence.

Authors:  Krista Todoric; Erik Lehman; Michael J Beck
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2012-03-23

9.  Experimental Validation of Methods for Prophylaxis against Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Review and Proposal.

Authors:  Paul S Agutter; P Colm Malone; Ian A Silver
Journal:  Thrombosis       Date:  2012-04-10

10.  Estimated Prevalence of Venous Thromboembolism in Iran: Prophylaxis Still an Unmet Challenge.

Authors:  Babak Sharif-Kashani; Azin Mohebi-Nejad; Seyed-Mohammad Abooturabi
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.