Literature DB >> 10477777

A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group.

M M Samama1, A T Cohen, J Y Darmon, L Desjardins, A Eldor, C Janbon, A Leizorovicz, H Nguyen, C G Olsson, A G Turpie, N Weisslinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute medical illnesses who may be at risk for venous thromboembolism have not been determined in adequately designed trials.
METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 1102 hospitalized patients older than 40 years to receive 40 mg of enoxaparin, 20 mg of enoxaparin, or placebo subcutaneously once daily for 6 to 14 days. Most patients were not in an intensive care unit. The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism between days 1 and 14, defined as deep-vein thrombosis detected by bilateral venography (or duplex ultrasonography) between days 6 and 14 (or earlier if clinically indicated) or documented pulmonary embolism. The duration of follow-up was three months.
RESULTS: The primary outcome could be assessed in 866 patients. The incidence of venous thromboembolism was significantly lower in the group that received 40 mg of enoxaparin (5.5 percent [16 of 291 patients]) than in the group that received placebo (14.9 percent [43 of 288 patients]) (relative risk, 0.37; 97.6 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.63; P< 0.001). The benefit observed with 40 mg of enoxaparin was maintained at three months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between the group that received 20 mg of enoxaparin (43 of 287 patients [15.0 percent]) and the placebo group. The incidence of adverse effects did not differ significantly between the placebo group and either enoxaparin group. By day 110, 50 patients had died in the placebo group (13.9 percent), 51 had died in the 20-mg group (14.7 percent), and 41 had died in the 40-mg group (11.4 percent); the differences were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment with 40 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously per day safely and effectively reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute medical illnesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10477777     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199909093411103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  285 in total

1.  Applying scientific criteria to therapeutic interchange: a balanced analysis of low-molecular-weight heparins.

Authors:  G J Merli; G J Vanscoy; T L Rihn; J B Groce; W McCormick
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Pharmacological thromboembolic prophylaxis in a medical ward: room for improvement.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; Emmanuèle Guignard; André Pannatier; Jacques Cornuz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Economic evaluation of enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients.

Authors:  Robin Offord; Adam C Lloyd; Pippa Anderson; Andy Bearne
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-08

4.  Preventing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: can we do better?

Authors:  Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Impact of a student-supported pharmacy assessment program on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Laura E Butkievich; Zachary A Stacy; Michael W Daly; Way Y Huey; Charles T Taylor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 6.  Thrombosis and cancer.

Authors:  Annie Young; Oliver Chapman; Carole Connor; Christopher Poole; Peter Rose; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Thromboembolic risk in the patient with heart failure.

Authors:  Liviu Klein; John B O'connell
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-08

8.  National and Regional Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Hospitalization Rates, Discharge Disposition, and Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Karl E Minges; Behnood Bikdeli; Yun Wang; Robert R Attaran; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  Measuring anti-factor xa activity to monitor low-molecular-weight heparin in obesity: a critical review.

Authors:  Gregory Egan; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

10.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Mary Cushman; Allison E Burnett; Susan R Kahn; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Frederick A Spencer; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Kenneth A Bauer; Francesco Dentali; Jill Lansing; Sara Balduzzi; Andrea Darzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Ignacio Neumann; Robby Nieuwlaat; Juan J Yepes-Nuñez; Yuan Zhang; Wojtek Wiercioch
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.