Literature DB >> 20352215

Traditional versus three-dimensional teaching of peritoneal embryogenesis: a comparative prospective study.

Bassem Abid1, Nejmeddine Hentati, Jean-Marc Chevallier, Ali Ghorbel, Vincent Delmas, Richard Douard.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anatomy teaching is newly boosted by the development of interactive three-dimensional (3D) teaching techniques. Nevertheless, their superiority as teaching aids has never been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare 3D and traditional chalk teaching efficiency in terms of student memorization concerning peritoneal embryogenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 165 students from the Faculties of Medicine of Sfax (Tunisia) (n = 81) and of Paris-Descartes (France) (n = 84) were taught peritoneal embryogenesis either via a 3D technique (interactive DVD ROM) (3D group, n = 85) or via the traditional chalk technique (CL group, n = 80). Both groups were subjected to an evaluation test including 34 questions distributed in six chapters at the end of the course.
RESULTS: The overall rate of correct answers was higher in the 3D group (65.12 +/- 14.88 vs. 49.33 +/- 16.17%, p < 0.001). It was the same for five of the six chapters of questions excluding the chapter concerning the clinical implications (p = 0.06). There was no significant difference between 3D and CL groups regarding the 20 questions focusing on static phenomena (64.52 +/- 27.10 vs. 58.87 +/- 23.67%, p = 0.24), but the rate of correct answers was higher in the 3D group for the 14 questions focusing on dynamic phenomena (65.96 +/- 20.97 vs. 28.17 +/- 24.40%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The 3D technique is significantly more efficient than the traditional chalk technique for the teaching of peritoneal embryogenesis in terms of short-term memorization and particularly for the assimilation of dynamic phenomena. Medium-term and long-term studies are needed to demonstrate that this benefit has a long-lasting impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20352215     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-010-0653-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  15 in total

1.  Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century.

Authors:  R S Haluck; T M Krummel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-07

2.  Using QuickTime virtual reality objects in computer-assisted instruction of gross anatomy: Yorick--the VR Skull.

Authors:  G L Nieder; J N Scott; M D Anderson
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  The impact of curricular change on medical students' knowledge of anatomy.

Authors:  P P McKeown; D J A Heylings; M Stevenson; K J McKelvey; J R Nixon; D R McCluskey
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Going back to dissection in a medical curriculum: the paradigm of Necker-Enfants Malades.

Authors:  O Plaisant; E A Cabanis; V Delmas
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy?

Authors:  Katinka J A H Prince; Albert J A A Scherpbier; Henk van Mameren; Jan Drukker; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Evaluation of the operating room as a surgical teaching venue.

Authors:  S E Scallon; D J Fairholm; D D Cochrane; D C Taylor
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students.

Authors:  S W Waterston; I J Stewart
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  [3D modeling in the field of morphology: methods, interest and results].

Authors:  J F Uhl; O Plaisant; O Ami; V Delmas
Journal:  Morphologie       Date:  2006-03

9.  Anatomy: too much too soon at medical school.

Authors:  Shelain Patel
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.414

10.  A computerised technique for morphometry and 3D reconstruction of embryological structures.

Authors:  L A Arraez-Aybar; J R Mérida-Velasco; J Rodriguez-Vazquez; J Jiménez-Collado
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  2 in total

1.  Photogrammetry of Human Specimens: An Innovation in Anatomy Education.

Authors:  Aldis H Petriceks; Ashley S Peterson; Miguel Angeles; W Paul Brown; Sakti Srivastava
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2018-09-17

2.  Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualisation technology in anatomy learning: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katerina Bogomolova; Beerend P Hierck; Agnes E M Looijen; Johanne N M Pilon; Hein Putter; Bruce Wainman; Steven E R Hovius; Jos A van der Hage
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 6.251

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.