Literature DB >> 20352179

Field vole (Microtus agrestis) seasonal spacing behavior: the effect of predation risk by mustelids.

Zbigniew Borowski1, Edyta Owadowska.   

Abstract

There are numerous studies showing that predation risk may change different aspects of the behavior of prey, such as habitat use, activity pattern, and foraging. Prey should exhibit the strongest antipredatory response against their most deadly predator. Small mustelids are considered the most important mammalian predators of voles. Nevertheless, there is no general agreement as to whether strong antipredatory reactions exist in natural free-living populations of voles. Here, we studied the field vole Microtus agrestis spatial reaction to high predation risk from small mustelids in the breeding (August) and nonbreeding (October) seasons under natural conditions. Voles were exposed to a caged weasel (Mustela nivalis) and a stoat (Mustela erminea), as well as to the odors of these predators. The reactions of 30 field voles were monitored with radiotelemetry. The field voles were found to display antipredator reactions that varied with season. In the breeding period, in response to predation risk, voles reduced locomotory activity and daily-range size, whereas in the nonbreeding period they did not. Changes in home range position were similar for control and treatment voles, in both the breeding and nonbreeding periods. The results indicate that mustelid predators modify the spatial behavior of small rodents in natural conditions depending on season. This might be a reflection of differences in state-dependent responses to predation from sexually active or inactive individuals. This suggests that the basic antipredatory reaction of voles under high predation risk from small mustelids limits their locomotory activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20352179     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-010-0663-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  9 in total

1.  Nonlinearity in the predation risk of prey mobility.

Authors:  P B Banks; K Norrdahl; E Korpimäki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  State-dependent life histories.

Authors:  J M McNamara; A I Houston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effects of predatory risk and resource renewal on the timing of foraging activity in a gerbil community.

Authors:  Burt P Kotler; Yoram Ayal; Aziz Subach
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Does risk of predation by mammalian predators affect the spacing behaviour of rodents? Two large-scale experiments.

Authors:  P Jonsson; E Koskela; T Mappes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Variation in predation risk and vole feeding behaviour: a field test of the risk allocation hypothesis.

Authors:  Janne Sundell; Dorota Dudek; Ines Klemme; Elina Koivisto; Jyrki Pusenius; Hannu Ylönen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Breeding suppression in free-ranging grey-sided voles under the influence of predator odour.

Authors:  Olaf Fuelling; Stefan Halle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Effects of radiotransmitters on the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus.

Authors:  A B Webster; R J Brooks
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 1.597

8.  Foraging patterns of voles at heterogeneous avian and uniform mustelid predation risk.

Authors:  Jana A Eccard; Jyrki Pusenius; Janne Sundell; Stefan Halle; Hannu Ylönen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators.

Authors:  T Liesenjohann; J A Eccard
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.964

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Fitness, risk taking, and spatial behavior covary with boldness in experimental vole populations.

Authors:  Jana A Eccard; Antje Herde; Andrea C Schuster; Thilo Liesenjohann; Tatjana Knopp; Gerald Heckel; Melanie Dammhahn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Photoperiod mediated changes in olfactory bulb neurogenesis and olfactory behavior in male white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus).

Authors:  James C Walton; Leah M Pyter; Zachary M Weil; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impact of Predator Exclusion and Habitat on Seroprevalence of New World Orthohantavirus Harbored by Two Sympatric Rodents within the Interior Atlantic Forest.

Authors:  Briana Spruill-Harrell; Anna Pérez-Umphrey; Leonardo Valdivieso-Torres; Xueyuan Cao; Robert D Owen; Colleen B Jonsson
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.048

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.