Literature DB >> 14576932

Breeding suppression in free-ranging grey-sided voles under the influence of predator odour.

Olaf Fuelling1, Stefan Halle.   

Abstract

The breeding suppression hypothesis predicts that females of certain small mammal species will reduce reproduction as a response to the odour of a specialised mammalian predator. This was tested in a field experiment with grey-sided voles (Clethrionomys rufocanus) during three summer seasons (1997-1999) in the subalpine tundra of northern Norway, which is a natural habitat of this species. In a first phase free-ranging voles in six unfenced 1-ha plots were monitored by live-trapping from June to August each year. In a second phase from August to September, three of the plots were sprayed with weasel (Mustela nivalis) odour to simulate increased apparent predation risk, while the remaining three plots served as untreated controls. On all plots voles were individually marked with ear tattoos and were regularly live-trapped during the whole breeding season to follow their performance. On the treatment plots the recruitment rate of juveniles did not increase in late summer as it did on the control plots. The proportion of reproductively non-active adult females was significantly higher on the treatment plots for both old and young females. Our results thus verify the breeding suppression hypothesis for the first time under natural conditions. However, the response in overwintered females is in conflict with the original hypothesis because the assumed fitness benefits from breeding delayed until the next season are inaccessible to them. As an alternative explanation we propose a short-term response of reduced activity and interrupted breeding until the predator has exploited and left the feeding patch. Such a "duck and cover" strategy would increase the fitness of females of all age classes when prey habitats are patchy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14576932     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1417-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Nonlinearity in the predation risk of prey mobility.

Authors:  P B Banks; K Norrdahl; E Korpimäki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Vole cycles and antipredatory behaviour.

Authors:  H Ylönen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Immediate and long-term effects of novel odors on risk assessment in mice.

Authors:  E D Kemble; B L Bolwahnn
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-04

5.  Predation hazard and seed removal by small mammals: microhabitat versus patch scale effects.

Authors:  Michael A Bowers; James L Dooley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Behaviour of cyclic bank voles under risk of mustelid predation: do females avoid copulations?

Authors:  H Ronkainen; H Ylönen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Arms races between and within species.

Authors:  R Dawkins; J R Krebs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

8.  Does risk of predation by mammalian predators affect the spacing behaviour of rodents? Two large-scale experiments.

Authors:  P Jonsson; E Koskela; T Mappes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum.

Authors:  Z Abramsky; E Strauss; A Subach; A Riechman; B P Kotler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Why are predator urines aversive to prey?

Authors:  D L Nolte; J R Mason; G Epple; E Aronov; D L Campbell
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  8 in total

1.  Field vole (Microtus agrestis) seasonal spacing behavior: the effect of predation risk by mustelids.

Authors:  Zbigniew Borowski; Edyta Owadowska
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-03-30

2.  To breed, or not to breed? Predation risk induces breeding suppression in common voles.

Authors:  Mateusz Jochym; Stefan Halle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Relaxation of risk-sensitive behaviour of prey following disease-induced decline of an apex predator, the Tasmanian devil.

Authors:  Tracey Hollings; Hamish McCallum; Kaely Kreger; Nick Mooney; Menna Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  From process to pattern: how fluctuating predation risk impacts the stress axis of snowshoe hares during the 10-year cycle.

Authors:  Michael J Sheriff; Charles J Krebs; Rudy Boonstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Voles on small islands: effects of food limitation and alien predation.

Authors:  Karen Fey; Peter B Banks; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Olfactory cues and the value of information: voles interpret cues based on recent predator encounters.

Authors:  Sonny S Bleicher; Hannu Ylönen; Teemu Käpylä; Marko Haapakoski
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  Voles and weasels in the boreal Fennoscandian small mammal community: what happens if the least weasel disappears due to climate change?

Authors:  Hannu Ylönen; Marko Haapakoski; Thorbjörn Sievert; Janne Sundell
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.654

8.  Wild Norway Rats Do Not Avoid Predator Scents When Collecting Food in a Familiar Habitat: A Field Study.

Authors:  Rafał Stryjek; Berenika Mioduszewska; Ewelina Spaltabaka-Gędek; Grzegorz R Juszczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.