Literature DB >> 18648858

Foraging patterns of voles at heterogeneous avian and uniform mustelid predation risk.

Jana A Eccard1, Jyrki Pusenius, Janne Sundell, Stefan Halle, Hannu Ylönen.   

Abstract

Temporal variation of antipredatory behavior and a uniform distribution of predation risk over refuges and foraging sites may create foraging patterns different from those anticipated from risk in heterogenous habitats. We studied the temporal variation in foraging behavior of voles exposed to uniform mustelid predation risk and heterogeneous avian predation risk of different levels induced by vegetation types in eight outdoor enclosures (0.25 ha). We manipulated mustelid predation risk with weasel presence or absence and avian predation risk by reducing or providing local cover at experimental food patches. Foraging at food patches was monitored by collecting giving-up densities at artificial food patches, overall activity was automatically monitored, and mortality of voles was monitored by live-trapping and radiotracking. Voles depleted the food to lower levels in the sheltered patches than in the exposed ones. In enclosures with higher avian predation risk caused by lower vegetation height, trays were depleted to lower levels. Unexpectedly, voles foraged in more trays and depleted trays to lower levels in the presence of weasels than in the absence. Weasels match their prey's body size and locomotive abilities and therefore increase predation risk uniformly over both foraging sites and refuge sites that can both be entered by the predator. This reduces the costs of missing opportunities other than foraging. Voles changed their foraging strategy accordingly by specializing on the experimental food patches with predictable returns and probably reduced their foraging in the matrix of natural food source with unpredictable returns and high risk to encounter the weasel. Moreover, after 1 day of weasel presence, voles shifted their main foraging activities to avoid the diurnal weasel. This behavior facilitated bird predation, probably by nocturnal owls, and more voles were killed by birds than by weasels. Food patch use of voles in weasel enclosures increased with time. Voles had to balance the previously missed feeding opportunities by progressively concentrating on artificial food patches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18648858     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1100-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?

Authors:  A Sih
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Circadian activity patterns, photoperiodic responses and population cycles in voles : I. Long-term variations in circadian activity patterns.

Authors:  S Halle; U Lehmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents.

Authors:  Joel S Brown; Burt P Kotler; Rosemary J Smith; William O Wirtz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum.

Authors:  Z Abramsky; E Strauss; A Subach; A Riechman; B P Kotler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Foraging decisions in risk-uniform landscapes.

Authors:  Jana Anja Eccard; Thilo Liesenjohann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Field vole (Microtus agrestis) seasonal spacing behavior: the effect of predation risk by mustelids.

Authors:  Zbigniew Borowski; Edyta Owadowska
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-03-30

2.  State-dependent foraging: lactating voles adjust their foraging behavior according to the presence of a potential nest predator and season.

Authors:  Thilo Liesenjohann; Monique Liesenjohann; Lenka Trebaticka; Janne Sundell; Marko Haapakoski; Hannu Ylönen; Jana A Eccard
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research - exploring new avenues to address spatiotemporal biodiversity dynamics.

Authors:  Florian Jeltsch; Dries Bonte; Guy Pe'er; Björn Reineking; Peter Leimgruber; Niko Balkenhol; Boris Schröder; Carsten M Buchmann; Thomas Mueller; Niels Blaum; Damaris Zurell; Katrin Böhning-Gaese; Thorsten Wiegand; Jana A Eccard; Heribert Hofer; Jette Reeg; Ute Eggers; Silke Bauer
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.600

4.  Experimental evidence for opposing effects of high deer density on tick-borne pathogen prevalence and hazard.

Authors:  Sara Gandy; Elizabeth Kilbride; Roman Biek; Caroline Millins; Lucy Gilbert
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  The broken-wing display across birds and the conditions for its evolution.

Authors:  Léna de Framond; Henrik Brumm; Wren I Thompson; Shane M Drabing; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Foraging decisions in risk-uniform landscapes.

Authors:  Jana Anja Eccard; Thilo Liesenjohann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Foraging under uniform risk from different types of predators.

Authors:  T Liesenjohann; J A Eccard
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.964

8.  The importance of predation risk and missed opportunity costs for context-dependent foraging patterns.

Authors:  Jana A Eccard; Thilo Liesenjohann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Food quality and quantity are more important in explaining foraging of an intermediate-sized mammalian herbivore than predation risk or competition.

Authors:  Martijn J A Weterings; Sander Moonen; Herbert H T Prins; Sipke E van Wieren; Frank van Langevelde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk.

Authors:  Jana A Eccard; Thilo Liesenjohann; Melanie Dammhahn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.225

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.