PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mRNA expression and EGFR gene dosage by quantitative PCR in tumor samples obtained from patients with gefitinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed in order to determine the association with treatment outcome, clinical, and biological features [EGFR copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), EGFR tyrosine kinase mutations, and EGFR protein expression]. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: EGFR mRNA expression was measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in 64 patients, and EGFR gene dosage was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR in 82 patients from paraffin-embedded specimens. RESULTS: EGFR mRNA expression was higher in responders to gefitinib as compared with nonresponders (P = 0.012). Patients with high EGFR mRNA expression (>5.01) had 43% response probability, whereas patients with low EGFR mRNA expression had 8% response probability (P = 0.006). Patients with high EGFR mRNA expression had longer median progression-free (5.3 versus 2.8 months, P = 0.028) but not overall survival (13.8 versus 10.9 months, P = 0.87). EGFR mRNA expression was higher in FISH-positive patients (P = 0.001) and in patients with positive EGFR immunostaining (P < 0.001) but not in patients with EGFR mutations (P = 0.19). EGFR gene dosage did not predict response (P = 0.54), progression-free (P = 0.73), or overall survival (P = 0.89). EGFR gene dosage was not associated with FISH positivity (P = 0.15), relative mRNA expression (P = 0.27), EGFR mutation status (P = 0.39), and EGFR protein expression (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: EGFR mRNA expression is a predictive biomarker for response to gefitinib and to progression-free survival after gefitinib treatment. EGFR gene dosage is neither predictive for response nor progression-free nor overall survival.
PURPOSE:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mRNA expression and EGFR gene dosage by quantitative PCR in tumor samples obtained from patients with gefitinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed in order to determine the association with treatment outcome, clinical, and biological features [EGFR copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), EGFR tyrosine kinase mutations, and EGFR protein expression]. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:EGFR mRNA expression was measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in 64 patients, and EGFR gene dosage was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR in 82 patients from paraffin-embedded specimens. RESULTS:EGFR mRNA expression was higher in responders to gefitinib as compared with nonresponders (P = 0.012). Patients with high EGFR mRNA expression (>5.01) had 43% response probability, whereas patients with low EGFR mRNA expression had 8% response probability (P = 0.006). Patients with high EGFR mRNA expression had longer median progression-free (5.3 versus 2.8 months, P = 0.028) but not overall survival (13.8 versus 10.9 months, P = 0.87). EGFR mRNA expression was higher in FISH-positive patients (P = 0.001) and in patients with positive EGFR immunostaining (P < 0.001) but not in patients with EGFR mutations (P = 0.19). EGFR gene dosage did not predict response (P = 0.54), progression-free (P = 0.73), or overall survival (P = 0.89). EGFR gene dosage was not associated with FISH positivity (P = 0.15), relative mRNA expression (P = 0.27), EGFR mutation status (P = 0.39), and EGFR protein expression (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION:EGFR mRNA expression is a predictive biomarker for response to gefitinib and to progression-free survival after gefitinib treatment. EGFR gene dosage is neither predictive for response nor progression-free nor overall survival.
Authors: Rafal Dziadziuszko; Daniel T Merrick; Samir E Witta; Adelita D Mendoza; Barbara Szostakiewicz; Amelia Szymanowska; Witold Rzyman; Katarzyna Dziadziuszko; Jacek Jassem; Paul A Bunn; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Fred R Hirsch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rafal Dziadziuszko; Murry W Wynes; Shalini Singh; Bernadette Reyna Asuncion; James Ranger-Moore; Krzysztof Konopa; Witold Rzyman; Barbara Szostakiewicz; Jacek Jassem; Fred R Hirsch Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Sarah Wheeler; Doris R Siwak; Raymond Chai; Courtney LaValle; Raja R Seethala; Lin Wang; Kathleen Cieply; Carol Sherer; Corwin Joy; Gordon B Mills; Athanassios Argiris; Jill M Siegfried; Jennifer R Grandis; Ann Marie Egloff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Yun Xiao; Sujatha Gajapathy; Margaret Skokan; Ming Lin; Vincent O'Neill; Paul A Bunn Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Martin L Sos; Kathrin Michel; Thomas Zander; Jonathan Weiss; Peter Frommolt; Martin Peifer; Danan Li; Roland Ullrich; Mirjam Koker; Florian Fischer; Takeshi Shimamura; Daniel Rauh; Craig Mermel; Stefanie Fischer; Isabel Stückrath; Stefanie Heynck; Rameen Beroukhim; William Lin; Wendy Winckler; Kinjal Shah; Thomas LaFramboise; Whei F Moriarty; Megan Hanna; Laura Tolosi; Jörg Rahnenführer; Roel Verhaak; Derek Chiang; Gad Getz; Martin Hellmich; Jürgen Wolf; Luc Girard; Michael Peyton; Barbara A Weir; Tzu-Hsiu Chen; Heidi Greulich; Jordi Barretina; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Levi A Garraway; Adi F Gazdar; John D Minna; Matthew Meyerson; Kwok-Kin Wong; Roman K Thomas Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: S E Witta; R Dziadziuszko; K Yoshida; K Hedman; M Varella-Garcia; P A Bunn; F R Hirsch Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 32.976