Literature DB >> 20346864

MONICA: a compact, portable dual gamma camera system for mouse whole-body imaging.

Wenze Xi1, Jurgen Seidel, John W Kakareka, Thomas J Pohida, Diane E Milenic, James Proffitt, Stan Majewski, Andrew G Weisenberger, Michael V Green, Peter L Choyke.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We describe a compact, portable dual-gamma camera system (named "MONICA" for MObile Nuclear Imaging CAmeras) for visualizing and analyzing the whole-body biodistribution of putative diagnostic and therapeutic single photon emitting radiotracers in animals the size of mice.
METHODS: Two identical, miniature pixelated NaI(Tl) gamma cameras were fabricated and installed "looking up" through the tabletop of a compact portable cart. Mice are placed directly on the tabletop for imaging. Camera imaging performance was evaluated with phantoms and field performance was evaluated in a weeklong In-111 imaging study performed in a mouse tumor xenograft model.
RESULTS: Tc-99m performance measurements, using a photopeak energy window of 140 keV+/-10%, yielded the following results: spatial resolution (FWHM at 1 cm), 2.2 mm; sensitivity, 149 cps (counts per seconds)/MBq (5.5 cps/microCi); energy resolution (FWHM, full width at half maximum), 10.8%; count rate linearity (count rate vs. activity), r(2)=0.99 for 0-185 MBq (0-5 mCi) in the field of view (FOV); spatial uniformity, <3% count rate variation across the FOV. Tumor and whole-body distributions of the In-111 agent were well visualized in all animals in 5-min images acquired throughout the 168-h study period.
CONCLUSION: Performance measurements indicate that MONICA is well suited to whole-body single photon mouse imaging. The field study suggests that inter-device communications and user-oriented interfaces included in the MONICA design facilitate use of the system in practice. We believe that MONICA may be particularly useful early in the (cancer) drug development cycle where basic whole-body biodistribution data can direct future development of the agent under study and where logistical factors, e.g., limited imaging space, portability and, potentially, cost are important. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20346864      PMCID: PMC2847584          DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Biol        ISSN: 0969-8051            Impact factor:   2.408


  4 in total

1.  New devices for imaging in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Roberto Pani; Rosanna Pellegrini; Maria Nerina Cinti; Carlo Trotta; Paolo Bennati; Margherita Betti; Giuseppe De Vincentis; Francesco Cusanno; Franco Garibaldi; Stefano Ridolfi; Stan Majewsky; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.099

2.  Applicability of a high-resolution small semiconductor gamma camera to small animal imaging.

Authors:  Yasushi Kiyono; Yuji Kuge; Yumiko Katada; Hidekazu Kawashima; Yasuhiro Magata; Hideo Saji
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Preclinical evaluation of a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor as a radioimmunodiagnostic and radioimmunotherapeutic agent.

Authors:  G L Ray; K E Baidoo; K J Wong; M Williams; K Garmestani; M W Brechbiel; D E Milenic
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  FDA drug approval summary: panitumumab (Vectibix).

Authors:  Ruthann M Giusti; Kaushikkumar A Shastri; Martin H Cohen; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-05
  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  In Vitro and In Vivo Pre-Clinical Analysis of a F(ab')(2) Fragment of Panitumumab for Molecular Imaging and Therapy of HER1 Positive Cancers.

Authors:  Karen J Wong; Kwamena E Baidoo; Tapan K Nayak; Kayhan Garmestani; Martin W Brechbiel; Diane E Milenic
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.138

2.  Characterization of "γ-Eye": a Low-Cost Benchtop Mouse-Sized Gamma Camera for Dynamic and Static Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Maria Georgiou; Eleftherios Fysikopoulos; Konstantinos Mikropoulos; Eirini Fragogeorgi; George Loudos
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  SPECT detectors: the Anger Camera and beyond.

Authors:  Todd E Peterson; Lars R Furenlid
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Comparison of planar, PET and well-counter measurements of total tumor radioactivity in a mouse xenograft model.

Authors:  Michael V Green; Jurgen Seidel; Mark R Williams; Karen J Wong; Anita Ton; Falguni Basuli; Peter L Choyke; Elaine M Jagoda
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Performance characteristics of a positron projection imager for mouse whole-body imaging.

Authors:  Jurgen Seidel; Wenze Xi; John W Kakareka; Thomas J Pohida; Elaine M Jagoda; Michael V Green; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Gamma Camera Imaging with Rotating Multi-Pinhole Collimator. A Monte Carlo Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Victor Ilisie; Laura Moliner; Constantino Morera; Johan Nuyts; José María Benlloch
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Performance evaluation of a newly developed high-resolution, dual-head animal SPECT system based on the NEMA NU1-2007 standard.

Authors:  Vahideh Moji; Navid Zeratkar; Mohammad Hossein Farahani; Mahmoud Reza Aghamiri; Salar Sajedi; Behnoosh Teimourian; Pardis Ghafarian; Saeed Sarkar; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.