Literature DB >> 20346512

Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Orkun Muftuoglu1, Pawan Prasher, R Wayne Bowman, James P McCulley, V Vinod Mootha.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), and in age-matched controls.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, non-comparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one eyes of 28 patients who underwent DSAEK, 20 eyes of 16 patients who underwent PKP, and 31 eyes of 31 control patients. INTERVENTION: The corneal topography and HOAs of the central 4- and 6-mm zones from anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were evaluated postoperatively with the Scheimpflug rotating imaging system (Oculus Gmbh, Wetzlar, Germany). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anterior and posterior corneal HOAs.
RESULTS: The mean anterior corneal total HOAs of the central 4 and 6 mm were 0.599+/-0.288 microm and 1.215+/-0.496 microm, respectively, in eyes that underwent DSAEK; 1.730+/-0.826 microm and 3.349+/-1.490 microm, respectively, in eyes that underwent PKP; and 0.439+/-0.163 microm and 0.921+/-0.300 microm, respectively, in controls. Although the mean anterior corneal total HOAs of the central 4 and 6 mm were significantly higher in eyes that underwent PKP than in eyes that underwent DSAEK and in controls (P<0.01), there was no significant difference in anterior corneal total HOAs of the central 4 and 6 mm between eyes that underwent DSAEK and controls. The mean posterior corneal total HOAs of the central 4 and 6 mm were 3.680+/-1.586 microm and 7.142+/-3.011 microm, respectively, in eyes that underwent DSAEK; 2.957+/-1.238 microm and 5.314+/-2.095 microm, respectively, in eyes that underwent PKP; and 0.818+/-0.193 microm and 1.609+/-0.344 microm, respectively, in controls. Although there was no significant difference in posterior corneal total HOAs of the central 4 mm between the DSAEK group and the PKP group, the posterior corneal HOAs of the central 6 mm were significantly higher in the DSAEK group than in the PKP group (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Although posterior corneal HOAs are significantly higher in eyes that underwent DSAEK, anterior corneal HOAs are not significantly different in eyes that underwent DSAEK than those of age-matched controls. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20346512     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  21 in total

1.  Visual performance with wave aberration correction after penetrating, deep anterior lamellar, or endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Seth M Pantanelli; Ramkumar Sabesan; Steven S T Ching; Geunyoung Yoon; Holly B Hindman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Graft thickness, graft folds, and aberrations after descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for fuchs dystrophy.

Authors:  Loren S Seery; Cherie B Nau; Jay W McLaren; Keith H Baratz; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin DSAEK in the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Duggan; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Charles C Lin; Ariana Austin; Paula C Labadzinzki; Winston D Chamberlain
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Comparison of four methods of surface roughness assessment of corneal stromal bed after lamellar cutting.

Authors:  Clotilde Jumelle; Alina Hamri; Gregory Egaud; Cyril Mauclair; Stephanie Reynaud; Virginie Dumas; Sandrine Pereira; Thibaud Garcin; Philippe Gain; Gilles Thuret
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Effects of corneal irregular astigmatism on visual acuity after conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Daisuke Tomida; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Akiko Ogawa; Yumiko Hirayama; Seika Shimazaki-Den; Yoshiyuki Satake; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Retrospective contralateral study comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  A-K B Maier; E Gundlach; J Gonnermann; M K J Klamann; E Bertelmann; P W Rieck; A M Joussen; N Torun
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Evaluation of factors affecting visual acuity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Shiro Amano; Akira Setogawa; Kenji Inoue
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Post-DSAEK optical changes: a comprehensive prospective analysis on the role of ocular wavefront aberrations, haze, and corneal thickness.

Authors:  Holly B Hindman; Krystel R Huxlin; Seth M Pantanelli; Christine L Callan; Ramkumar Sabesan; Steven S T Ching; Brooke E Miller; Tim Martin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Graft dislocation and graft failure following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using precut tissue: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sonja Heinzelmann; Daniel Böhringer; Philipp Eberwein; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Bilateral Ultrathin Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty vs. Bilateral Penetrating Keratoplasty in Fuchs' Dystrophy: Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Massimo Castellucci; Costanza Novara; Alessandra Casuccio; Giovannni Cillino; Carla Giordano; Valentina Failla; Vincenza Bonfiglio; Maria Vadalà; Salvatore Cillino
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.