Literature DB >> 20345430

Maintenance of weight loss after lifestyle interventions for overweight and obesity, a systematic review.

J C M Barte1, N C W ter Bogt, R P Bogers, P J Teixeira, B Blissmer, T A Mori, W J E Bemelmans.   

Abstract

Lifestyle interventions can reduce body weight, but weight regain is common and may particularly occur with higher initial weight loss. If so, one may argue whether the 10% weight loss in clinical guidelines is preferable above a lower weight loss. This systematic review explores the relation between weight loss during an intervention and weight maintenance after at least 1 year of unsupervised follow-up. Twenty-two interventions (during at least 1 month) in healthy overweight Caucasians were selected and the mean percentages of weight loss and maintenance were calculated in a standardized way. In addition, within four intervention groups (n > 80) maintenance was calculated stratified by initial weight loss (0-5%, 5-10%, >10%). Overall, mean percentage maintenance was 54%. Weight loss during the intervention was not significantly associated with percentage maintenance (r = -0.26; P = 0.13). Percentage maintenance also not differed significantly between interventions with a weight loss of 5-10% vs. >10%. Consequently, net weight loss after follow-up differed between these categories (3.7 vs. 7.0%, respectively; P < 0.01). The analyses within the four interventions confirmed these findings. In conclusion, percentage maintenance does not clearly depend on initial weight loss. From this perspective, 10% or more weight loss can indeed be encouraged and favoured above lower weight loss goals.
© 2010 The Authors. obesity reviews © 2010 International Association for the Study of Obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20345430     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00740.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  111 in total

1.  Attitudinal familism predicts weight management adherence in Mexican-American women.

Authors:  Julia L Austin; Jane Ellen Smith; Loren Gianini; Marita Campos-Melady
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-04-10

2.  Weight management by phone conference call: a comparison with a traditional face-to-face clinic. Rationale and design for a randomized equivalence trial.

Authors:  Kate Lambourne; Richard A Washburn; Cheryl Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; Jeannine Goetz; Robert Lee; Bryan K Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Increasing low-energy-dense foods and decreasing high-energy-dense foods differently influence weight loss trial outcomes.

Authors:  M Vadiveloo; H Parker; H Raynor
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Is lost lean mass from intentional weight loss recovered during weight regain in postmenopausal women?

Authors:  Kristen M Beavers; Mary F Lyles; Cralen C Davis; Xuewen Wang; Daniel P Beavers; Barbara J Nicklas
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Does the method of weight loss effect long-term changes in weight, body composition or chronic disease risk factors in overweight or obese adults? A systematic review.

Authors:  Richard A Washburn; Amanda N Szabo; Kate Lambourne; Erik A Willis; Lauren T Ptomey; Jeffery J Honas; Stephen D Herrmann; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Weight and Veterans' Environments Study (WAVES) I and II: Rationale, Methods, and Cohort Characteristics.

Authors:  Shannon N Zenk; Elizabeth Tarlov; Lisa M Powell; Coady Wing; Stephen A Matthews; Sandy Slater; Howard S Gordon; Michael Berbaum; Marian L Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2017-03-02

7.  Social status predicts response to dietary cycling in female rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Kaitlyn M Roman; Mark E Wilson; Vasiliki Michopoulos
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Readiness for behaviour change in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: implications for multidisciplinary care models.

Authors:  Karen E Stewart; Deborah L Haller; Carol Sargeant; James L Levenson; Puneet Puri; Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.828

9.  Results of the Exercise and Nutrition to Enhance Recovery and Good Health for You (ENERGY) Trial: A Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention in Overweight or Obese Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Cheryl L Rock; Shirley W Flatt; Tim E Byers; Graham A Colditz; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Patricia A Ganz; Kathleen Y Wolin; Anthony Elias; Helen Krontiras; Jingxia Liu; Michael Naughton; Bilgé Pakiz; Barbara A Parker; Rebecca L Sedjo; Holly Wyatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A virtual reality intervention (Second Life) to improve weight maintenance: Rationale and design for an 18-month randomized trial.

Authors:  D K Sullivan; J R Goetz; C A Gibson; M S Mayo; R A Washburn; Y Lee; L T Ptomey; J E Donnelly
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.