BACKGROUND: Despite the well-known recidivism of obesity, surprisingly little is known about the composition of body weight during weight regain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the composition of body weight regained after intentional weight loss is similar to the composition of body weight lost. DESIGN: The design was a follow-up to a randomized controlled trial of weight loss in which body composition was analyzed and compared in 78 postmenopausal women before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 6 and 12 mo after the intervention. RESULTS: All body mass and composition variables were lower immediately after weight loss than at baseline (all P < 0.05). More fat than lean mass was lost with weight loss, which resulted in body-composition changes favoring a lower percentage of body fat and a higher lean-to-fat mass ratio (P < 0.001). Considerable interindividual variability in weight regain was noted (CV = 1.07). In women who regained ≥2 kg body weight, a decreasing trend in the lean-to-fat mass ratio was observed, which indicated greater fat mass accretion than lean mass accretion (P < 0.001). Specifically, for every 1 kg fat lost during the weight-loss intervention, 0.26 kg lean tissue was lost; for every 1 kg fat regained over the following year, only 0.12 kg lean tissue was regained. CONCLUSIONS: Although not all postmenopausal women who intentionally lose weight will regain it within 1 y, the data suggest that fat mass is regained to a greater degree than is lean mass in those who do experience some weight regain. The health ramifications of our findings remain to be seen.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite the well-known recidivism of obesity, surprisingly little is known about the composition of body weight during weight regain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the composition of body weight regained after intentional weight loss is similar to the composition of body weight lost. DESIGN: The design was a follow-up to a randomized controlled trial of weight loss in which body composition was analyzed and compared in 78 postmenopausal women before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 6 and 12 mo after the intervention. RESULTS: All body mass and composition variables were lower immediately after weight loss than at baseline (all P < 0.05). More fat than lean mass was lost with weight loss, which resulted in body-composition changes favoring a lower percentage of body fat and a higher lean-to-fat mass ratio (P < 0.001). Considerable interindividual variability in weight regain was noted (CV = 1.07). In women who regained ≥2 kg body weight, a decreasing trend in the lean-to-fat mass ratio was observed, which indicated greater fat mass accretion than lean mass accretion (P < 0.001). Specifically, for every 1 kg fat lost during the weight-loss intervention, 0.26 kg lean tissue was lost; for every 1 kg fat regained over the following year, only 0.12 kg lean tissue was regained. CONCLUSIONS: Although not all postmenopausal women who intentionally lose weight will regain it within 1 y, the data suggest that fat mass is regained to a greater degree than is lean mass in those who do experience some weight regain. The health ramifications of our findings remain to be seen.
Authors: Richard F Hamman; Rena R Wing; Sharon L Edelstein; John M Lachin; George A Bray; Linda Delahanty; Mary Hoskin; Andrea M Kriska; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Judith Regensteiner; Beth Venditti; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: D Gallagher; A J Kovera; G Clay-Williams; D Agin; P Leone; J Albu; D E Matthews; S B Heymsfield Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: M Visser; A B Newman; M C Nevitt; S B Kritchevsky; E B Stamm; B H Goodpaster; T B Harris Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Jamy D Ard; Miranda Cook; Julia Rushing; Annette Frain; Kristen Beavers; Gary Miller; Michael E Miller; Barb Nicklas Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Lisa Kosmiski; Sarah J Schmiege; Margherita Mascolo; Jennifer Gaudiani; Philip S Mehler Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jerome L Fleg; Daniel E Forman; Kathy Berra; Vera Bittner; James A Blumenthal; Michael A Chen; Susan Cheng; Dalane W Kitzman; Mathew S Maurer; Michael W Rich; Win-Kuang Shen; Mark A Williams; Susan J Zieman Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Clemens Drenowatz; Gregory A Hand; Michael Sagner; Robin P Shook; Stephanie Burgess; Steven N Blair Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Laura M Welti; Daniel P Beavers; Bette J Caan; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Mara Z Vitolins; Kristen M Beavers Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Denise K Houston; Michael E Miller; Dalane W Kitzman; W Jack Rejeski; Stephen P Messier; Mary F Lyles; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Barbara J Nicklas Journal: J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2019-03-08
Authors: Kara L Kliewer; Jia-Yu Ke; Hui-Young Lee; Michael B Stout; Rachel M Cole; Varman T Samuel; Gerald I Shulman; Martha A Belury Journal: J Nutr Biochem Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Richard A Winett; Brenda M Davy; Elaina Marinik; Jyoti Savla; Sheila G Winett; Stuart M Phillips; Lesley D Lutes Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.046