Literature DB >> 20345404

Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land.

Andrew T Knight1, Richard M Cowling, Mark Difford, Bruce M Campbell.   

Abstract

Abstract  Spatial prioritization techniques are applied in conservation-planning initiatives to allocate conservation resources. Although typically they are based on ecological data (e.g., species, habitats, ecological processes), increasingly they also include nonecological data, mostly on the vulnerability of valued features and economic costs of implementation. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of conservation actions implemented through conservation-planning initiatives is a function of the human and social dimensions of social-ecological systems, such as stakeholders' willingness and capacity to participate. We assessed human and social factors hypothesized to define opportunities for implementing effective conservation action by individual land managers (those responsible for making day-to-day decisions on land use) and mapped these to schedule implementation of a private land conservation program. We surveyed 48 land managers who owned 301 land parcels in the Makana Municipality of the Eastern Cape province in South Africa. Psychometric statistical and cluster analyses were applied to the interview data so as to map human and social factors of conservation opportunity across a landscape of regional conservation importance. Four groups of landowners were identified, in rank order, for a phased implementation process. Furthermore, using psychometric statistical techniques, we reduced the number of interview questions from 165 to 45, which is a preliminary step toward developing surrogates for human and social factors that can be developed rapidly and complemented with measures of conservation value, vulnerability, and economic cost to more-effectively schedule conservation actions. This work provides conservation and land management professionals direction on where and how implementation of local-scale conservation should be undertaken to ensure it is feasible.
© 2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20345404     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01494.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  17 in total

1.  Toward a conceptual framework for blending social and biophysical attributes in conservation planning: a case-study of privately-conserved lands.

Authors:  Lorena Pasquini; Chasca Twyman; John Wainwright
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Voluntary nonmonetary conservation approaches on private land: a review of constraints, risks, and benefits for raptor nest protection.

Authors:  Andrea Santangeli; Toni Laaksonen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Landowner behavior can determine the success of conservation strategies for ecosystem migration under sea-level rise.

Authors:  Christopher R Field; Ashley A Dayer; Chris S Elphick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The potential for double-loop learning to enable landscape conservation efforts.

Authors:  Brian Petersen; Jensen Montambault; Marni Koopman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 5.  Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning.

Authors:  Aija S Kukkala; Atte Moilanen
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2012-12-22

6.  How much does it cost to expand a protected area system? Some critical determining factors and ranges of costs for Queensland.

Authors:  Vanessa M Adams; Daniel B Segan; Robert L Pressey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of disputes and easement violations on the cost-effectiveness of land conservation.

Authors:  Richard Schuster; Peter Arcese
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Cheap and nasty? The potential perils of using management costs to identify global conservation priorities.

Authors:  Erin McCreless; Piero Visconti; Josie Carwardine; Chris Wilcox; Robert J Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bird community conservation and carbon offsets in western North America.

Authors:  Richard Schuster; Tara G Martin; Peter Arcese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Synergies for improving oil palm production and forest conservation in floodplain landscapes.

Authors:  Nicola K Abram; Panteleimon Xofis; Joseph Tzanopoulos; Douglas C MacMillan; Marc Ancrenaz; Robin Chung; Lucy Peter; Robert Ong; Isabelle Lackman; Benoit Goossens; Laurentius Ambu; Andrew T Knight
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.