Literature DB >> 20842499

Toward a conceptual framework for blending social and biophysical attributes in conservation planning: a case-study of privately-conserved lands.

Lorena Pasquini1, Chasca Twyman, John Wainwright.   

Abstract

There has been increasing recognition within systematic conservation planning of the need to include social data alongside biophysical assessments. However, in the approaches to identify potential conservation sites, there remains much room for improvement in the treatment of social data. In particular, few rigorous methods to account for the diversity of less-easily quantifiable social attributes that influence the implementation success of conservation sites (such as willingness to conserve) have been developed. We use a case-study analysis of private conservation areas within the Little Karoo, South Africa, as a practical example of the importance of incorporating social data into the process of selecting potential conservation sites to improve their implementation likelihood. We draw on extensive data on the social attributes of our case study obtained from a combination of survey questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. We discuss the need to determine the social attributes that are important for achieving the chosen implementation strategy by offering four tested examples of important social attributes in the Little Karoo: the willingness of landowners to take part in a stewardship arrangement, their willingness to conserve, their capacity to conserve, and the social capital among private conservation area owners. We then discuss the process of using an implementation likelihood ratio (derived from a combined measure of the social attributes) to assist the choice of potential conservation sites. We conclude by summarizing our discussion into a simple conceptual framework for identifying biophysically-valuable sites which possess a high likelihood that the desired implementation strategy will be realized on them.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20842499     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9548-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  14 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land.

Authors:  Andrew T Knight; Richard M Cowling; Mark Difford; Bruce M Campbell
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Fusion or failure? The future of conservation biology.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Richard M Cowling
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Conservation Biology at twenty.

Authors:  Gary K Meffe; David Ehrenfeld; Reed F Noss
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Accounting for system dynamics in reserve design.

Authors:  Shawn J Leroux; Fiona K A Schmiegelow; Steve G Cumming; Robert B Lessard; John Nagy
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Social Sciences and landscape analysis: opportunities for the improvement of conservation policy design.

Authors:  Ismael Vaccaro; Karma Norman
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Embracing opportunism in the selection of priority conservation areas.

Authors:  Andrew T Knight; Richard M Cowling
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Opportunism, threats, and the evolution of systematic conservation planning.

Authors:  Robert L Pressey; Madeleine C Bottrill
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.560

9.  Devising appropriate policies and instruments in support of private conservation areas: lessons learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa.

Authors:  Lorena Pasquini; Richard M Cowling; Chasca Twyman; John Wainwright
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  Comparing and integrating community-based and science-based approaches to prioritizing marine areas for protection.

Authors:  Natalie C Ban; Chris R Picard; Amanda C J Vincent
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.560

View more
  1 in total

1.  Barriers and opportunities for integrating social science into natural resource management: lessons from National Estuarine Research Reserves.

Authors:  Patrick Robinson; Ken Genskow; Bret Shaw; Robin Shepard
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.