Literature DB >> 25326877

Voluntary nonmonetary conservation approaches on private land: a review of constraints, risks, and benefits for raptor nest protection.

Andrea Santangeli1, Toni Laaksonen.   

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation on private land of the developed world faces several challenges. The costs of land are often high, and the attitudes of landowners towards conservation are variable. Scientists and practitioners need to scan for and adopt cost-effective solutions that allow for the long-term sustainability of conservation measures on private land. In this study, we focus on one of such possible solutions: Working with landowners to implement voluntary nonmonetary conservation. We restrict our focus to protection of raptor nests, but the ideas can be applied to other taxa as well. Through a literature review, we show that a voluntary nonmonetary approach for protecting raptor nests has been so far largely neglected and/or rarely reported in the scientific literature. However, results of a questionnaire sent to BirdLife partners across Europe indicate that this approach is more widely used than it appears from the literature. We show that voluntary nonmonetary approaches may represent useful tools to protect raptor nests on private land. We provide a workflow for implementation of such an approach in raptor nest protection, highlighting benefits, potential risks, and constraints in the application of the strategy. We suggest that a voluntary nonmonetary approach may have great potential for cost-effective conservation, but the risks it may entail should be carefully assessed in each case. There is an urgent need to consider and evaluate novel approaches, such as the one described here, which may constitute missed opportunities for cost-effective conservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25326877     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0385-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land.

Authors:  Andrew T Knight; Richard M Cowling; Mark Difford; Bruce M Campbell
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  The need for evidence-based conservation.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Andrew S Pullin; Paul M Dolman; Teri M Knight
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment.

Authors:  Daniel Decaro; Michael Stokes
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Ecological efficiency of voluntary conservation of boreal-forest biodiversity.

Authors:  Mikko Mönkkönen; Anna-Liisa Ylisirniö; Tanja Hämäläinen
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 5.  Understanding and managing conservation conflicts.

Authors:  Steve M Redpath; Juliette Young; Anna Evely; William M Adams; William J Sutherland; Andrew Whitehouse; Arjun Amar; Robert A Lambert; John D C Linnell; Allan Watt; R J Gutiérrez
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Human impacts on the rates of recent, present, and future bird extinctions.

Authors:  Stuart Pimm; Peter Raven; Alan Peterson; Cagan H Sekercioglu; Paul R Ehrlich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Nest sites as a key resource for population persistence: A case study modelling nest occupancy under forestry practices.

Authors:  María V Jiménez-Franco; Julia Martínez-Fernández; José E Martínez; Iluminada Pagán; José F Calvo; Miguel A Esteve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.