Literature DB >> 1459436

Heterozygote advantage and the evolution of a dominant diploid phase.

D B Goldstein1.   

Abstract

The life cycle of eukaryotic, sexual species is divided into haploid and diploid phases. In multicellular animals and seed plants, the diploid phase is dominant, and the haploid phase is reduced to one, or a very few cells, which are dependent on the diploid form. In other eukaryotic species, however, the haploid phase may dominate or the phases may be equally developed. Even though an alternation between haploid and diploid forms is fundamental to sexual reproduction in eukaryotes, relatively little is known about the evolutionary forces that influence the dominance of haploidy or diploidy. An obvious genetic factor that might result in selection for a dominant diploid phase is heterozygote advantage, since only the diploid phase can be heterozygous. In this paper, I analyze a model designed to determine whether heterozygote advantage could lead to the evolution of a dominant diploid phase. The main result is that heterozygote advantage can lead to an increase in the dominance of the diploid phase, but only if the diploid phase is already sufficiently dominant. Because the diploid phase is unlikely to be increased in organisms that are primarily haploid, I conclude that heterozygote advantage is not a sufficient explanation of the dominance of the diploid phase in higher plants and animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1459436      PMCID: PMC1205239     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  4 in total

1.  Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; J F Crow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Early Generation Analysis of Lengths of Heterozygous Chromosome Segments around a Locus Held Heterozygous with Backcrossing or Selfing.

Authors:  W D Hanson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1959-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits.

Authors:  R Lande; R Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  DNA fingerprints applied to gene introgression in breeding programs.

Authors:  J Hillel; T Schaap; A Haberfeld; A J Jeffreys; Y Plotzky; A Cahaner; U Lavi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  The evolution of haploid, diploid and polymorphic haploid-diploid life cycles: the role of meiotic mutation.

Authors:  D W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Heterozygote advantage as a natural consequence of adaptation in diploids.

Authors:  Diamantis Sellis; Benjamin J Callahan; Dmitri A Petrov; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Somatic mutation favors the evolution of diploidy.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Does diploidy increase the rate of adaptation?

Authors:  H A Orr; S P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolution of dominance in gene expression pattern associated with phenotypic robustness.

Authors:  Kenji Okubo; Kunihiko Kaneko
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.