Literature DB >> 20340098

Insertional translocation detected using FISH confirmation of array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results.

Sung-Hae L Kang1, Chad Shaw, Zhishuo Ou, Patricia A Eng, M Lance Cooper, Amber N Pursley, Trilochan Sahoo, Carlos A Bacino, A Craig Chinault, Pawel Stankiewicz, Ankita Patel, James R Lupski, Sau Wai Cheung.   

Abstract

Insertional translocations (ITs) are rare events that require at least three breaks in the chromosomes involved and thus qualify as complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCR). In the current study, we identified 40 ITs from approximately 18,000 clinical cases (1:500) using array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in conjunction with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmation of the aCGH findings, and parental follow-up studies. Both submicroscopic and microscopically visible IT events were detected. They were divided into three major categories: (1) simple intrachromosomal and interchromosomal IT resulting in pure segmental trisomy, (2) complex IT involving more than one abnormality, (3) deletion inherited from a parent with a balanced IT resulting in pure segmental monosomy. Of the cases in which follow-up parental studies were available, over half showed inheritance from an apparently unaffected parent carrying the same unbalanced rearrangement detected in the propositi, thus decreasing the likelihood that these IT events are clinically relevant. Nevertheless, we identified six cases in which small submicroscopic events were detected involving known disease-associated genes/genomic segments and are likely to be pathogenic. We recommend that copy number gains detected by clinical aCGH analysis should be confirmed using FISH analysis whenever possible in order to determine the physical location of the duplicated segment. We hypothesize that the increased use of aCGH in the clinic will demonstrate that IT occurs more frequently than previously considered but can identify genomic rearrangements with unclear clinical significance. Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20340098      PMCID: PMC3726029          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  31 in total

1.  Submicroscopic duplication in Xq28 causes increased expression of the MECP2 gene in a boy with severe mental retardation and features of Rett syndrome.

Authors:  M Meins; J Lehmann; F Gerresheim; J Herchenbach; M Hagedorn; K Hameister; J T Epplen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Array CGH detection of a cryptic deletion in a complex chromosome rearrangement.

Authors:  Carla Rosenberg; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Maria de Lourdes Chauffaille; Decio Brunoni; Ana Lucia Catelani; Willem Sloos; Károly Szuhai; Hans J Tanke
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Duplication of the MECP2 region is a frequent cause of severe mental retardation and progressive neurological symptoms in males.

Authors:  Hilde Van Esch; Marijke Bauters; Jaakko Ignatius; Mieke Jansen; Martine Raynaud; Karen Hollanders; Dorien Lugtenberg; Thierry Bienvenu; Lars Riff Jensen; Jozef Gecz; Claude Moraine; Peter Marynen; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Guy Froyen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Trisomy of chromosome 16p13.3 due to an unbalanced insertional translocation into chromosome 22p13.

Authors:  Thomy de Ravel; Peter Aerssens; Joris R Vermeesch; Jean-Pierre Fryns
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  De novo complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) in a severely mentally retarded boy.

Authors:  J P Fryns; A Kleczkowska; H Kenis
Journal:  Ann Genet       Date:  1984

Review 6.  Interchromosomal insertions. Identification of five cases and a review.

Authors:  J O Van Hemel; H J Eussen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Development and validation of a CGH microarray for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Sau W Cheung; Chad A Shaw; Wei Yu; Jiangzham Li; Zhishuo Ou; Ankita Patel; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Mitchell L Cooper; Patti Furman; Pawel Stankiewicz; Pawal Stankiewicz; James R Lupski; A Craig Chinault; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  RAG mutations in human B cell-negative SCID.

Authors:  K Schwarz; G H Gauss; L Ludwig; U Pannicke; Z Li; D Lindner; W Friedrich; R A Seger; T E Hansen-Hagge; S Desiderio; M R Lieber; C R Bartram
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Autism and other neuropsychiatric symptoms are prevalent in individuals with MeCP2 duplication syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa B Ramocki; Sarika U Peters; Y Jane Tavyev; Feng Zhang; Claudia M B Carvalho; Christian P Schaaf; Ronald Richman; Ping Fang; Daniel G Glaze; James R Lupski; Huda Y Zoghbi
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Partial V(D)J recombination activity leads to Omenn syndrome.

Authors:  A Villa; S Santagata; F Bozzi; S Giliani; A Frattini; L Imberti; L B Gatta; H D Ochs; K Schwarz; L D Notarangelo; P Vezzoni; E Spanopoulou
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  30 in total

1.  X-linked congenital hypertrichosis syndrome is associated with interchromosomal insertions mediated by a human-specific palindrome near SOX3.

Authors:  Hongwen Zhu; Dandan Shang; Miao Sun; Sunju Choi; Qing Liu; Jiajie Hao; Luis E Figuera; Feng Zhang; Kwong Wai Choy; Yang Ao; Yang Liu; Xiao-Lin Zhang; Fengzhen Yue; Ming-Rong Wang; Li Jin; Pragna I Patel; Tao Jing; Xue Zhang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Practical guidelines for interpreting copy number gains detected by high-resolution array in routine diagnostics.

Authors:  Nicolien M Hanemaaijer; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Gerben van der Vries; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Roel Hordijk; Anthonie J van Essen; Hermine E Veenstra-Knol; Wilhelmina S Kerstjens-Frederikse; Johanna C Herkert; Erica H Gerkes; Lamberta K Leegte; Klaas Kok; Richard J Sinke; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Next-generation sequencing of duplication CNVs reveals that most are tandem and some create fusion genes at breakpoints.

Authors:  Scott Newman; Karen E Hermetz; Brooke Weckselblatt; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Large genomic insertion at the Shh locus results in hammer toes through enhancer adoption.

Authors:  Christina Paliou; Guillaume Andrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Parental insertional balanced translocations are an important cause of apparently de novo CNVs in patients with developmental anomalies.

Authors:  Beata A Nowakowska; Nicole de Leeuw; Claudia Al Ruivenkamp; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; John A Crolla; Reinhilde Thoelen; Marije Koopmans; Nicolette den Hollander; Arie van Haeringen; Anne-Marie van der Kevie-Kersemaekers; Rolph Pfundt; Hanneke Mieloo; Ton van Essen; Bert B A de Vries; Andrew Green; Willie Reardon; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Interstitial Chromosome 3p13p14 Deletions: An Update and Review.

Authors:  Catherine A Hajek; Jianling Ji; Sulagna C Saitta
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2018-04-07

Review 7.  Use of Genetic Testing for Primary Immunodeficiency Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer R Heimall; David Hagin; Joud Hajjar; Sarah E Henrickson; Hillary S Hernandez-Trujillo; Yuval Tan; Lisa Kobrynski; Kenneth Paris; Troy R Torgerson; James W Verbsky; Richard L Wasserman; Elena W Y Hsieh; Jack J Blessing; Janet S Chou; Monica G Lawrence; Rebecca A Marsh; Sergio D Rosenzweig; Jordan S Orange; Roshini S Abraham
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 8.317

8.  Interstitial Chromosome 3p14.1 Deletion due to a Maternal Insertion: Phenotype and Association with Balanced Parental Rearrangement.

Authors:  Catherine Hajek; Jia-Chi Wang; Loretta W Mahon; Ariadna Martinez; Sulagna C Saitta
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-03-16

9.  MLPA for confirmation of array CGH results and determination of inheritance.

Authors:  Alison Hills; Joo Wook Ahn; Celia Donaghue; Helen Thomas; Kathy Mann; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 10.  Mechanisms of Origin, Phenotypic Effects and Diagnostic Implications of Complex Chromosome Rearrangements.

Authors:  Martin Poot; Thomas Haaf
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.