Literature DB >> 20336309

Application of bioreactance for cardiac output assessment during exercise in healthy individuals.

Adrian Elliott1, James H Hull, David Nunan, Djordje G Jakovljevic, David Brodie, Lesley Ansley.   

Abstract

In patients with cardiac failure, bioreactance-based cardiac output (CO) monitoring provides a valid non-invasive method for assessing cardiac performance during exercise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this technique during strenuous exercise in healthy, trained individuals. Fourteen recreational cyclists, mean (SD) age of 34 (8) years and relative peak oxygen uptake of (VO(2)) 56 (6) ml kg(-1) min(-1), underwent incremental maximal exercise testing, whilst CO was recorded continuously using a novel bioreactance-based device (CO(bio)). The CO(bio) was evaluated against relationship with VO(2), theoretical calculation of arterial-venous oxygen difference (C(a - v) O(2)) and level of agreement with an inert gas rebreathing method (CO(rb)) using a Bland-Altman plot. Bioreactance-based CO measurement was practical and straightforward in application, although there was intermittent loss of electrocardiograph signal at high-intensity exercise. At rest and during exercise, CO(bio) was strongly correlated with VO(2) (r = 0.84; P < 0.001), however, there was evidence of systematic bias with CO(bio) providing lower values than CO(rb); mean bias (limits of agreement) -19% (14.6 to -53%). Likewise, calculated (C(a - v) O(2)) was greater when determined using CO(bio) than CO(rb) (P < 0.001), although both devices provided values in excess of those reported in invasive studies. Bioreactance-based determination of CO provides a pragmatic approach to the continuous assessment of cardiac performance during strenuous exercise in trained individuals. Our findings, however, suggest that further work is needed to refine the key measurement determinants of CO using this device to improve measurement accuracy in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20336309     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1440-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  20 in total

1.  Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output during exercise in healthy young humans: comparison between Modelflow method and Doppler echocardiography method.

Authors:  J Sugawara; T Tanabe; M Miyachi; K Yamamoto; K Takahashi; M Iemitsu; T Otsuki; S Homma; S Maeda; R Ajisaka; M Matsuda
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2003-12

2.  Cardiac output and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in heart failure: application of a new bio-reactance device.

Authors:  Jonathan Myers; Pradeep Gujja; Suresh Neelagaru; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.712

3.  Simplified calculation of body-surface area.

Authors:  R D Mosteller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Automated non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: comparison of electrical bioimpedance and carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques.

Authors:  S A Smith; A E Russell; M J West; J Chalmers
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-03

6.  Measurement of cardiac output by electrical impedance at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  J C Denniston; J T Maher; J T Reeves; J C Cruz; A Cymerman; R F Grover
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography during maximal exercise tests.

Authors:  K K Teo; M D Hetherington; R G Haennel; P V Greenwood; R E Rossall; T Kappagoda
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 8.  Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. Part II: Novel techniques and new advances.

Authors:  D E Warburton; M J Haykowsky; H A Quinney; D P Humen; K K Teo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Comparison of exercise cardiac output by the Fick principle using oxygen and carbon dioxide.

Authors:  X G Sun; J E Hansen; H Ting; M L Chuang; W W Stringer; D Adame; K Wasserman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine.

Authors:  Bernd Scheer; Azriel Perel; Ulrich J Pfeiffer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Djordje G Jakovljevic; Sarah Moore; Kate Hallsworth; Gulnar Fattakhova; Christian Thoma; Michael I Trenell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Test-Retest Reliability of Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement during Exercise in Healthy Volunteers in Daily Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Michael Thomas Coll Barroso; Matthias Wilhelm Hoppe; Philip Boehme; Thomas Krahn; Christian Kiefer; Frank Kramer; Thomas Mondritzki; Phillipe Pirez; Wilfried Dinh
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.