BACKGROUND: Over half the world is exposed daily to the smoke from combustion of solid fuels. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the main contributors to the global burden of disease and can be caused by biomass smoke exposure. However, studies of biomass exposure and COPD show a wide range of effect sizes. The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the impact of biomass smoke on the development of COPD and define reasons for differences in the reported effect sizes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of studies with sufficient statistical power to calculate the health risk of COPD from the use of solid fuel, which followed standardised criteria for the diagnosis of COPD and which dealt with confounding factors. The results were pooled by fuel type and country to produce summary estimates using a random effects model. Publication bias was also estimated. RESULTS: There were positive associations between the use of solid fuels and COPD (OR=2.80, 95% CI 1.85 to 4.0) and chronic bronchitis (OR=2.32, 95% CI 1.92 to 2.80). Pooled estimates for different types of fuel show that exposure to wood smoke while performing domestic work presents a greater risk of development of COPD and chronic bronchitis than other fuels. CONCLUSION: Despite heterogeneity across the selected studies, exposure to solid fuel smoke is consistently associated with COPD and chronic bronchitis. Efforts should be made to reduce exposure to solid fuel by using either cleaner fuel or relatively cleaner technology while performing domestic work.
BACKGROUND: Over half the world is exposed daily to the smoke from combustion of solid fuels. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the main contributors to the global burden of disease and can be caused by biomass smoke exposure. However, studies of biomass exposure and COPD show a wide range of effect sizes. The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the impact of biomass smoke on the development of COPD and define reasons for differences in the reported effect sizes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of studies with sufficient statistical power to calculate the health risk of COPD from the use of solid fuel, which followed standardised criteria for the diagnosis of COPD and which dealt with confounding factors. The results were pooled by fuel type and country to produce summary estimates using a random effects model. Publication bias was also estimated. RESULTS: There were positive associations between the use of solid fuels and COPD (OR=2.80, 95% CI 1.85 to 4.0) and chronic bronchitis (OR=2.32, 95% CI 1.92 to 2.80). Pooled estimates for different types of fuel show that exposure to wood smoke while performing domestic work presents a greater risk of development of COPD and chronic bronchitis than other fuels. CONCLUSION: Despite heterogeneity across the selected studies, exposure to solid fuel smoke is consistently associated with COPD and chronic bronchitis. Efforts should be made to reduce exposure to solid fuel by using either cleaner fuel or relatively cleaner technology while performing domestic work.
Authors: H Dean Hosgood; Hu Wei; Amir Sapkota; Imran Choudhury; Nigel Bruce; Kirk R Smith; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: S Semple; C Garden; M Coggins; K S Galea; P Whelan; H Cowie; A Sánchez-Jiménez; P S Thorne; J F Hurley; J G Ayres Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Ankita Misra; Matthew P Longnecker; Kathie L Dionisio; Riana M S Bornman; Gregory S Travlos; Sukhdev Brar; Kristina W Whitworth Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Claudia L Bianchi; Giuseppina Cerrato; Carlo Pirola; Federico Galli; Valentino Capucci Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Michael Guarnieri; Esperanza Diaz; Daniel Pope; Ellen A Eisen; Jennifer Mann; Kirk R Smith; Tone Smith-Sivertsen; Nigel G Bruce; John R Balmes Journal: Chest Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Adwoa A Commodore; Stella M Hartinger; Claudio F Lanata; Daniel Mäusezahl; Ana I Gil; Daniel B Hall; Manuel Aguilar-Villalobos; Luke P Naeher Journal: Atmos Environ (1994) Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.798